成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 878 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

Is the timeline of around five years for the land management plan correct, or should the period of time be longer?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

That is helpful鈥攖hank you.

If obligations were set out in a land management plan over a longer period of time鈥攍et us say 10 years鈥攕hould the new owner of the land carry forward those obligations if the land is sold within that period of time?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

I understand that, but, for those things that are not changed, do you think that they should be held responsible for implementing them, if they are responsible for doing so?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

I take a simple approach to things such as plans: somebody has to be responsible for their implementation. If parts of a plan are not implemented, who is responsible for that? Who is responsible for implementing the bits that are being taken forward? I am trying to understand your view. If a land management plan containing clear obligations is set out and the land manager consults on it, spends 拢15,000 on it and says that he will take it forward but does not bother doing so, who should be responsible for that?

10:45  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

I understand that material changes might come along that result in a need to have a variation to the plan, but, for areas where that does not happen, who should be responsible? Why should the landowner not be responsible for implementing the things that they set out in their plan?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

I am not talking about areas where there is a clear material change. In areas where there is a clear obligation, and landowners have given a commitment to implement measures, why should they not be responsible for implementing them?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

My final question is on the fact that it is proposed that the land management plan does not include aggregated corporate holdings. Do you think that it should be extended to include aggregated corporate holdings?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

Would it be?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

What鈥攖he obligations that go with it?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Michael Matheson

Okay. I turn to the threshold of 3,000 hectares. Do you think that that is the right threshold?