The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 874 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Okay. Let us examine the approach to lotting that is set out in the bill. I understand that the transfer test will be a public interest test, but I still struggle to understand why we would not put on a statutory footing, through the bill, some form of public interest test duty for the factors that will be taken into consideration in decisions about lotting, for example. Why does the bill not set that on a statutory footing?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Good afternoon, Richard. You have been a member of the board since the setting up of ESS, as you mentioned in your opening contribution. What would you bring specifically to the role of chair of the board, if you were appointed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
You mentioned in your opening contribution that you thought that ESS had been doing well since it was established. What do you think it has been doing well, and not doing well, during your time on the board?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
You mentioned the duration of land management plans. As it stands, the bill envisages them being reviewed and, if necessary, revised every five years. Some of the evidence that the committee has heard suggests that five years is too short a timeframe in relation to managing land. I am told that forestry plans, for example, are often for 20 or 30 years. I suppose that part of the challenge is whether five years is an appropriate timeframe in which to look at revising a management plan and incurring further costs when that might not be realistic. Are you open to the idea of increasing that timeframe for revising land management plans?
I am conscious that, if you are open to that, it becomes more difficult. The longer the period during which a plan is due to be implemented, the more difficult it is to be specific, because circumstances change. If you were minded to look at extending the revising period, is there a need to balance how specific a land management plan can be over a longer period of time?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
If we get to the point where someone is the third-largest landowner in the country but does not have a land management plan to their name, while someone who happens to have one piece of land that is just over the threshold has to go to the extent of having a full land management plan, there will be a real inequity to that. That needs to be addressed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
I do not understand why we cannot spell out in the bill what will be considered in the public interest test duty. Why can we not do that? We do it in other legislation, do we not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Before he does, why is it not necessary to put the test in this bill, but it was necessary in other legislation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
Let us take a step back, please, because I do not think that that was a helpful response.
Can you explain why the bill should be treated differently from other pieces of legislation in which we have specified the public interest test, if the intention is for the transfer provisions in the bill鈥攖he transfer test鈥攖o be a public interest test? What prohibits us from doing that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
If, however, we wanted to introduce additional measures alongside that, they could be put on a statutory footing in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Michael Matheson
I think that we have got the point.