The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 874 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
So you supplement that with an improvement plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
Sorry, but I am a wee bit confused. What do you mean by an improvement plan? I thought that you had a five-year plan.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
What do you need to happen to get that 3 per cent this year?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
When did the five-year plan start?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
Paul White.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
Is that because of the on-going rolling programme that allows you to keep the skills together?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Michael Matheson
Liam, it sounds as though the German approach to electrification is paying off, if the cost of electrification in Scotland is reducing because of a rolling programme. Can you remind me what the cost is per kilometre for electrifying a line? If I recall correctly, it used to be around 拢1 million. Is it still around that price?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning. I would like to follow that line of questioning. The overall pot of money has not decreased; the way in which it is being utilised has changed. So, does the fact that more of the Scottish Government鈥檚 bus funding is being used for concessionary travel, which means that there is less money available for the network support grant, mean that the expansion of concessionary travel has resulted in greater transport inequality?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Matheson
Not specifically on hydrogen. Parts of the network will be challenging to electrify, and would not make sense economically in terms of distance. There is also an issue in that it would probably create greater risk in relation to weather resilience on some of those routes. For example, if you electrify the line going up to Inverness, it is likely that adverse weather will impact overhead lines and so on, but I know that part of the plan is to electrify it.
I recognise that hydrogen technology is not there yet. At best, hydrogen might get deployed in a local commuter train capacity, but certainly not in intercity capacity, given the energy demands that there would be. Battery technology, again, will probably be used in the commuter space at best, rather than in the intercity space. I suspect that we will end up falling back on some sort of diesel hybrid. How can we deploy that technology in a way that helps to reduce its carbon output? I am conscious that renewable-type diesels could be deployed that might be a mechanism that would allow you to use diesel while significantly reducing your carbon footprint. Has there been discussion about that in the industry? Could you see that developing in other parts of the industry outwith Scotland?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Matheson
I was struck by the comment that Greig MacKay made about the fact that fare prices do not rank highly when bus users are surveyed about the priorities that should be taken forward to make bus travel more attractive.
There is a limited pot of money, so if you were to prioritise funding to improve bus services and make them more attractive, would you invest in a greater expansion of concessionary travel, introduce a flat rate or capped fare or would you invest in bus prioritisation measures?