The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2371 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Will the minister take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
I recognise that the focus of the bill is on co-production with local authorities. We have had a number of debates about targets and putting more certainty in the bill. However, I believe that the best way forward and the best way to drive up recycling rates is to really double down on areas such as the code of practice and to get local authorities working together to try to deliver that. There should be uniformity where it makes sense to deliver that.
I am sympathetic to what Maurice Golden is looking to insert in the bill with amendment 161. I was thinking along the same lines. However, I am interested to hear the minister鈥檚 response to that.
There is a need to ensure that there are proper facilities for reuse and repair not just in one local authority area or a handful of exemplar local authority areas, but across the whole of Scotland. Embedding that into the bill is really important. I am interested to hear the minister鈥檚 response to that and how, if that cannot be supported today, it can be taken forward for stage 3.
Likewise, there is a need to get on with the code of practice. Maurice Golden鈥檚 amendment 58 would introduce a date of the end of 2025. I do not know whether that will be welcomed by local authorities, but we need clarity on what that date is and progress in relation to the code of practice.
To be honest, I am less clear about Bob Doris鈥檚 amendments, because there are some quite big choices for local authorities in that space. I speak as a former councillor鈥攁lbeit that I was a councillor some time ago now, before I entered Parliament in 2016鈥攚hen I say that the decision on whether to invest in a household garden waste service is a difficult one. Driving around in big trucks and picking up garden waste is not always the best environmental option. It is also important that councils configure household bulk uplift services in a way that is just. Those are important choices that councils need to make.
I am not entirely sure about the extent to which all of that can be codified in a code of practice. I am also not entirely sure that consistency is always the best approach.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
When does the minister think that the code will be produced?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Will the member take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
If Scottish ministers issued such guidance, would that cut across any collective bargaining that the unions might put in place with COSLA on issues related to terms and conditions? That is a genuine question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Will the member take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
It has been an interesting debate. In summing up, can you say whether you believe that there is a role for single-use item charges at all? What I have heard from you has been pretty negative.
I am not quite sure about the analogy of chip paper鈥攁s a consumer, I certainly would not want to reuse chip paper. What do you see as the role of single-use charges? They have been effective for carrier bags, and there has been a long-standing policy development around the use of charges in relation to coffee cups and other hot-drink cups.
I am interested to know the thrust of what it is that you are trying to achieve with your amendments. If you are trying to achieve clarity by putting more requirements in the text of the bill in relation to schemes that are brought forward, or trying to design in exemptions around the nature of biodegradability and everything else, I can understand where you are coming from, but that seems to be quite a negative place. It seems that you do not, fundamentally, see a use for such charges, which may be seen as punitive, but which鈥攊t could be argued鈥攏onetheless have a pretty critical role in reducing waste and delivering behavioural change.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
We have lots of time, so let us use the time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Did COSLA approve these amendments, which would require its approval on various matters?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Will the member give way?