The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2390 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Is it possible that the climate science may say that we need to meet net zero before 2045?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Does the member agree that part of the issue is that some aspects of waste processing have naturally fallen more in the realm of the energy strategy and thinking about how we meet energy needs鈥攖hat is particularly the case with energy from waste鈥攁nd less in the circular economy space? Historically, the issue has fallen between the stools of energy and waste, but you seem to be suggesting that it should absolutely be seen as part of waste processing infrastructure.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
To bring it back to the question, the point that you are making is that there is a question about the extent to which it is worth investing in further alignment when the fundamental uncertainty exists that a new Government could come in and just rip it up or there could be a change in thinking.
Peter Holmes or David Hamilton, does either of you want to come in on my initial question?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
That came across well in your previous answer on the willingness to get in the room, come with an agenda and open up to that dialogue. Is the door open? If there is a willingness to talk about alignment with the ETS or any other detailed policy area, can the right people from the UK get into the room at European level鈥攅ven if it is a room next door, as you say鈥攕tart to bring an agenda into those conversations and build up that trust informally?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Mike Buckley, your report contains a number of recommendations, and I want to focus on two of them. On chemical regulations, we have two systems working in parallel, at the moment. There is the UK鈥檚 system, and there is the EU鈥檚 registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals鈥擱EACH鈥攕cheme. Then there is the EU emissions trading scheme, in which we have two systems that relate to each other but are not part of a single market in emissions trading. There are some issues with that because of market size, efficiency and everything else. Could you unpack what specific changes you think are achievable through a TCA renegotiation on those two areas? If David Hamilton and Peter Holmes are interested in chipping in on that, I will take their views as well.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Yes, and also ETS alignment more broadly鈥攁nd potentially integration.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Does that require a TCA renegotiation of issues around alignment or negotiation of, say, a Europe-wide ETS, or can that happen separately if both parties are willing to enter into that process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
Will licensing reduce the number of serious injuries and deaths? I have a greyhound. He goes out for runs occasionally in a field or whatever and he might get a cut here and there, but the injuries that he had when he was racing, such as a broken hock, were far more significant. We see that sort of thing with greyhounds all the time. What will licensing do to prevent those catastrophic injuries and, in some cases, dogs being put down? I can see that having a vet on site to help clear up after an accident or treat a dog might be useful, but I am struggling to see how licensing will fundamentally change the picture that we have, which is that, when dogs are racing around a track at 40mph, they collide into each other and break their legs or suffer from a range of injuries, which can result in amputations and so on. What will licensing do to bring down the rate of those catastrophic injuries?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
You have made quite a distinction today, minister, about regulated versus unregulated tracks. We have a regulated track in Scotland, at Shawfield, although it has not been open for a number of years, and we have the unregulated track in Thornton. What is the difference in track design and inherent risk to dogs that are racing at Thornton and those racing at Shawfield? Is there a difference between the tracks?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Mark Ruskell
It has operated as a racing track.