The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I press amendment 310.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
It seems to have passed. Have any developers come to the Scottish Government saying that they would like to push ahead with a development and asking it to grant them a special development order or any other kind of permission that would allow the developers to do it as a trial?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Let us turn to an area where there is a regulatory gap because SEPA’s work applies only up to 3 nautical miles out. How will that regulatory gap be closed ahead of any planning applications that could come through for developments beyond 3 nautical miles?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
To go back to my original question, will the commencement of regulations to extend SEPA’s powers align with the decision on any planning application that is made under the regulations, should they be approved?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am curious about why the work has not been done already. Parliament has been considering the draft Environmental Authorisations (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025. I suppose that, in an ideal world, those regulations would have extended SEPA’s powers and you would have been able to tell us today that the environmental regulations were in place and you now wanted to bring in a planning system. Instead, I am hearing that you are trying to apply a planning system beyond 3 nautical miles, and to make that live, but that environmental regulations are coming some way down the track, so people must hold off putting in applications until there is certainty. That feels quite disjointed.
I am not asking you, as an official, to comment on those choices, but it feels as though there was an opportunity to make the update and bring in a consistent system with the environmental authorisations amendment regulations.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
On the subject of targets, I would like to ask you about the topic areas that were chosen for targets and whether you think that those are adequate. I will go into a bit of detail here. NatureScot said in evidence that
“the targets will need to be set carefully to avoid the potential of diverting attention from wider biodiversity improvements”.
Can you expand a little on what the concern is there?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Should the bill explicitly reflect the commitments that Scotland has signed up to in the global biodiversity framework? Should there be a 2030 target and a 2045 target in the bill, or does the bill implicitly deliver on that? I will bring in Chris Tuckett.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
How will that aim be achieved? Should the bill reflect the 2030 and 2045 targets or reference the international commitments? I am interested in how that should be reflected in the bill.
10:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can you say more about what you consider to be an effective trigger for a target in the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
It would be useful to have examples of where, practically, you see tension. The Government has said that the consent regime for grid infrastructure is problematic for EIAs. We have the UK Planning and Infrastructure Bill, a legislative consent memorandum for which has been considered by the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee this week.
Without going into the huge technicality around that, are the current systems fit for purpose? Is the overriding public interest test being applied? Are the tensions between net zero and wider protection of biodiversity being resolved in the existing system? I am interested in any reflections on environmental assessments, so pick out of that what you want.