The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2366 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Where do you see smallholders sitting? Should they be brought under the legislative framework for crofting, or does the existing provision for agricultural tenants meet the needs of smallholders?
10:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
I think that the Scottish Crofting Federation and the Landworkers Alliance take a different view. They would rather see smallholders sitting within the crofting legislation. Why do you take a different view? What are the reasons for that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
What would be the advantages and disadvantages of going one way or the other? Is there no difference?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Okay. How would you distinguish them? With crofting, there are common grazings. Collective land is managed. Smallholdings are individual holdings. Is that the big difference?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Okay. I am sure that more evidence will come on that. I will leave things there for now.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Your point about land management plans is that regardless of the size of the holding, the plans need to be transparent and proportionate. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
The bill contains only a transfer test, but we could also introduce a public interest test, in theory.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
There are huge opportunities, with or without the bill, for investment in nature and carbon markets, but do you see the bill as an opportunity to regulate those markets? At the moment, they are largely unregulated and it can feel to some communities a bit like the wild west.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
Is that why you think that smallholders fall more on the tenancy side than the crofting side?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to Mr Doris鈥檚 point about the decision on whether the threshold should be 3,000 hectares, 1,000 hectares or something in between. Is it fair to say that there is something arbitrary about the selection? We know that 3,000 hectares in one part of Scotland could look very different from 3,000 hectares in another part of Scotland and might bring in quite dramatically different sets of issues in terms of management, local communities, opportunities for housing and so on. We live in a geographically diverse country. Putting into legislation that land of a certain size needs to have a land management plan does not reflect the nature of the land.