The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
You will avoid the need to use section 8 because section 7 and section 6 will work more effectively. Is that right?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Does Ms Wilson want to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
It is nice to have, but it is not something that you want to be held to account for.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to come back to threatened species status, cabinet secretary. You described the need for a bit more latitude in the way that that is interpreted. In your letter to the committee you said that that could be put in place, either in the explanatory notes to the bill or in the bill itself. Would you consider an amendment in that regard, perhaps one that covers species that are in decline as well as those that are threatened?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Why are the goals for 2030 and 2045 not in the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is about a very small area, but the provisions in part 2 of the bill are extremely wide and give ministers the power to gut the habitats regulations should they choose to do so. Nevertheless, I will focus on that very specific example. My understanding is—and the answers that we got from NatureScot the other week suggest—that it is possible to change the designation to effectively redesignate sites if that is required. Under regulation 9D of the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c) (EU Exit) (Scotland) (Amendment) Regulations 2019, there is a duty on the Scottish ministers to “adapt” the site network.
I appreciate Stewart Cunningham’s comment that your interpretation is that you cannot legally do that. However, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has just published guidance to change regulations to enable site boundaries and features to be amended. Why is DEFRA wrong and why are you right?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to return to the subject of offshore wind. I think that the Government has said that its offshore wind ambitions are not achievable in the current system. I might have asked you a similar question when you gave evidence to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee on the legislative consent memorandum for the United Kingdom Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which will give the Scottish ministers some flexibility in relation to powers under the Electricity Act 1989.
I have a similar question on the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill. How will you use the powers under part 2 of the bill to provide the flexibility that is needed, which is particularly important for offshore wind transmission infrastructure? I think that that is the point that was made in relation to the UK bill. When you spoke about the UK bill at the NZET Committee, I think that you said that the intention would not be to change the environmental assessment regime, although I might have picked that up wrongly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that that has been stated by the Government, in the context of the current system.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
It is a little bit concerning to hear at stage 1 that there is an on-going conversation with DEFRA about the application of the law, but we will have several months over the summer to see what situation emerges.
We took evidence from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, which is responsible for nature conservation on a four-nations basis. Its view is that we should amend these powers “with very great caution” and that we would make wholesale changes “at our peril”. There is clearly concern among agencies and those who are monitoring the state of nature in this country about any powers in this section.
I will leave it there just now, but that is food for thought.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I was wondering whether there is precedent for having an environmental regulator as an adviser when it ultimately holds power over regulation. Is that something that NatureScot is already doing?
Ms Wilson described NatureScot as having a wider advisory role, but this is quite specific. It is about advising in a particular area on deer management plans, while also having a regulatory function. Is there precedent for how NatureScot and other environmental regulators have managed those two responsibilities? How have they dealt with the perception that there might be a conflict of interest?