The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is there any point in signing up to the global biodiversity goals for 2030 and 2045 if those are not reflected in legislation? The Government seems to be saying that the 2030 goal is lost and that we will do what we can through biodiversity action plans and strategies but we have no chance of meeting that target. It also seems to be saying that we might meet the 2045 target but we should not put it in legislation, because that would bind the Government to action that is beyond what we can actually achieve.
I am trying to understand the thinking behind that. Does it make sense to have such a target if we cannot meet it? If we have such a target, why not put it in legislation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
How will the Government maintain public confidence in venison if the venison dealer licence scheme is removed? We have heard some mixed views: there is some strong support for removing that scheme to bring more flexibility to the market and to who can sell venison. At the same time, some dealers and companies might be looking back at the 2015 E coli outbreak, with a residual fear around public confidence. I do not know how you are intending to address those matters of food safety and wider public confidence in venison as a healthy product.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Section 13 adds “nature restoration” as a ground for intervention in deer management. However, control schemes under the section 8 powers in the 1996 act have not been used until relatively recently. Do you envisage the position changing under the bill, with more use of section 8 powers?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
I understand that there is a crossover between the strategy, the delivery plans and the bill, but if there is something in the law that prevents action from being taken in a delivery plan, this would be an opportunity to fix it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have largely covered the difference between the EIA and the environmental outcome report regimes. The EOR regime is not up and running yet, but if there was a need for alignment there, would the Government consider issuing guidance before using the powers under part 2?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Compared with environmental outcome reports, which are embedded in the UK Planning and Infrastructure Bill, does our current system of environmental assessment work when it comes to the nascent technologies of marine and tidal? Is there a need to fix anything in that space?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
But would you be up for reflecting in some form somewhere in the bill the international commitments that the Government has signed up to?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay—have a think about it.
I want to raise a couple of other issues that are not included in the bill. We have an on-going issue with marine enforcement. We have marine protected areas—lines on the map—but enforcement is very difficult to achieve. In a recent example, somebody who dredged for scallops in an MPA was given a fixed-penalty notice but sold the scallops for more than the fixed-penalty notice was worth. There seem to be some fundamental issues around enforcement, fines and so on. There is nothing in the bill on enforcement, but is this an opportunity to look at that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Perhaps developed indicators could be the trigger.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can I reflect on that? In theory, the current system looks like a good one, but clearly it has not worked at all, and that is why we are where we are, with the nature crisis and the need to tackle deer management seriously. We are talking about an improvement to an existing system. Why do you think that the section 8 powers would not be used so much in the future?