˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2332 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24

Meeting date: 1 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

Is that a yes?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24

Meeting date: 1 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

And can you say, Peter, whether it is a changing picture?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24

Meeting date: 1 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

You see the difference, though. When we talk about executive pay, the description is that you have to be competitive as you are competing with the private sector, and you therefore have to increase salaries by 40 per cent in order to attract the best. When it comes to other grades within Scottish Water, you understand that there is a private sector that can employ people with a better wage or a better salary. Therefore, if you want to be competitive in attracting talent to a public corporation, do you not need to consider pay, given that pay in the contracted sector is probably better for people?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24

Meeting date: 1 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

So Scottish Water’s focus will be on adaptation rather purely on mitigation, because that is inherent.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24

Meeting date: 1 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

It is like a parlour game.

We have a number of bathing water quality areas in Scotland that are not safe, to be honest. Kinghorn harbour is one of those, and that is despite substantial investment from Scottish Water and a very long process with SEPA.

I am interested in your thoughts on whether CSOs are the primary issue in those situations, or are there wider issues relating to diffuse pollution and agriculture, for example? Although those areas are not in your remit, we will not be able to tackle those problems without changes in land management further upstream.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Scottish Water Annual Report and Accounts 2023-24

Meeting date: 1 April 2025

Mark Ruskell

It is like a parlour game.

We have a number of bathing water quality areas in Scotland that are not safe, to be honest. Kinghorn harbour is one of those, and that is despite substantial investment from Scottish Water and a very long process with SEPA.

I am interested in your thoughts on whether CSOs are the primary issue in those situations, or are there wider issues relating to diffuse pollution and agriculture, for example? Although those areas are not in your remit, we will not be able to tackle those problems without changes in land management further upstream.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Well, maybe if there is more information—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

In the last cleaner air for Scotland strategy, which was published in 2021, there was a commitment to bring in that code of practice. Is that work now really quite behind schedule?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Will the exemptions be considered on a case-by-case basis? Say there was a situation where there was an arable area on an island, and there were, therefore, concerns about cadmium uptake in crops, could SEPA still say, “Well, actually, that’s not an appropriate area to be spreading sewage sludge,” and therefore rule against it, or is it that, if you are on an island, it is fine to spread sewage sludge?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 March 2025

Mark Ruskell

Okay. That answers the question.