The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2389 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are we falling behind in some areas—in critical minerals, for example?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have just a couple of follow-up questions. A lot of retailers invested in reverse vending machine facilities; I go past the Aldi in Crieff every week and see the unit with the RVM in it. How much of that has been mothballed and can be brought back, and how much of it is a sunk cost?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
And it is about the deposit return scheme—a new hope, let us call it.
There is now the potential for an aligned scheme across different parts of the UK. Initially, I am interested in hearing about the role that Zero Waste Scotland has played in this next chapter, the conversations that are being had at a UK-wide level, the development of the scheme, and how the experience in Scotland of coming very close to initiating a scheme has fed into where we are right now. Also, what will be your role in the run-up to 2027—assuming, of course, that the scheme is launched, goes ahead, is not subject to lobbying and being undermined and is eventually successful? I am interested to know how you see your role not just in developing policy, but in providing on-the-ground advice to retailers and the rest of it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Could non-municipal biodegradable waste end up being treated using that capacity, post-2028? Obviously, that depends on whether we get there with Government regulation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Following on from that, I am also interested in what your relationship with Environmental Standards Scotland is like. Take an area where we have a problem, such as battery storage at waste facilities. SEPA will have a view on regulations, but I am interested in where you sit within that conversation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are you saying that the vision and the objectives are broadly similar but that the regulatory and fiscal tools to drive and meet that vision are perhaps not being replicated at UK state level?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will pursue that line of questioning. I am interested in knowing why the section 8 power has been used so infrequently over the decades. It feels as if the power has been redundant. Is part of the reason that there is an in-built fear of judicial review within NatureScot and Scottish Natural Heritage? To go back to Emma Roddick’s point about resourcing, do you fear that, if you use the option of a section 8 power, someone might challenge it and you would need deep pockets?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am struggling to understand how the venison dealers licence addresses the risk that FSS has articulated around E coli. If the meat already has to meet Food Standards Scotland requirements, and if FSS issued a warning in 2015 that all venison has to go through those who have a venison dealers licence, I am not sure where the risk is. It feels as if what we are discussing is more about traceability and communicating with the market, and how to deliver that through apps and security and quality assurance programmes, than anything else. I do not know—maybe I am just not fully getting it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
My question is in a similar vein, because I am also on the NZET Committee with Edward Mountain. I am interested in the witnesses’ thoughts on the provisions on land management plans that are in the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill and whether they will help or hinder. Clearly, some community engagement is required. Do you expect those plans to cover deer management? If so, how does that change the dynamic of getting a local consensus with surrounding communities and landowners on the appropriate objectives for deer management? Do you see deer management as something that landowners just might not consider as part of their land management plans?