The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am struggling to understand how the venison dealers licence addresses the risk that FSS has articulated around E coli. If the meat already has to meet Food Standards Scotland requirements, and if FSS issued a warning in 2015 that all venison has to go through those who have a venison dealers licence, I am not sure where the risk is. It feels as if what we are discussing is more about traceability and communicating with the market, and how to deliver that through apps and security and quality assurance programmes, than anything else. I do not know—maybe I am just not fully getting it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
My question is in a similar vein, because I am also on the NZET Committee with Edward Mountain. I am interested in the witnesses’ thoughts on the provisions on land management plans that are in the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill and whether they will help or hinder. Clearly, some community engagement is required. Do you expect those plans to cover deer management? If so, how does that change the dynamic of getting a local consensus with surrounding communities and landowners on the appropriate objectives for deer management? Do you see deer management as something that landowners just might not consider as part of their land management plans?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
In relation to a section 8 order that was issued this month, you said:
“NatureScot cannot be satisfied that effective deer management will be put in place to address risks of significant impact on peatlands, woodlands and other habitats”.
What does the proposed new section 6ZB of the 1996 act add? It is about restoration. Does it change the nature of your consideration of the section 8 powers? It seems that you are already acting where there is deterioration as well as an urgent need for restoration. I am struggling to understand how the proposed new section 6ZB adds anything significant. Maybe you can explain.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
We are interested in those sections of the bill that relate to deer management, as the convener described. We are interested, in particular, in your comments on the incorporation of nature restoration as a ground for intervention—we discussed that in the previous session; the proposed changes to the control measures; and NatureScot’s ability to recover the expanded costs.
I see that Mr Orr-Ewing would like to go first.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in Grant Moir’s point about public institutions effectively doing a lot of the planning in this area. If a national park has a herbivore management strategy—Cairngorms has one, but I do not know whether Loch Lomond and the Trossachs has one yet, and maybe there will be one for Galloway in the future as well—that is a plan that is in place. Under the bill, FLS will have to facilitate the delivery of that as part of the park plan, so public institutions will be working to deliver that. Does that help to guide and steer the public interest? Could that be used, through the code of practice, as a way for NatureScot to consider how private actors in that space link in with the objectives?
I am thinking about the status. You have a park plan and a herbivore strategy. Should those have weight? How should that be taken into account when NatureScot makes decisions to require those with private interests to take action that aligns with the public interest in a plan that has gone through a democratic process, been approved by a park board and everything else?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would it not be easier to say that deterioration and restoration are part of the same picture, and that what we need is deer management and nature restoration orders? That would encapsulate everything rather than having a quite outdated system that is based on preserving remnants of biodiversity and then trying to bolt on something that is more about restoration and improvement? It feels quite confused.
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would you expect more or less potential risk of judicial review as a result of the bill, or do you think that there will be enough certainty with the bill and the code of practice so that everybody will know where they stand and it will be clear that a section 8 order is a section 8 order?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am thinking of examples from over the years. Would you say that that was the case with the Ardvar estate a number of years ago, when there were questions about why NatureScot was not using section 8 powers to intervene? Was it because the estate was so deteriorated that damage was difficult to prove?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
David Frenz, do you have a comment on that?