成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 16 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2670 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Role of Local Government in Delivering Net Zero

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

It is really interesting to hear your evidence, Franziska. I will pick up on your last point about how engaged citizens are in Freiburg. Will you talk me through the formal mechanisms for engaging citizens? Is there a danger of what we call consultation fatigue, as a result of people being constantly asked about public policy? What sort of mechanisms do you have for engaging citizens? Are there citizens assemblies or particular referendums or discussions on particular issues? How does such engagement manifest itself?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Role of Local Government in Delivering Net Zero

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

Can you give a specific example of where there has been conflict between the sustainable development goals and how that was resolved? Is it ultimately for politicians to resolve that conflict?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Role of Local Government in Delivering Net Zero

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

Do you see there being a role in a more sustainable supply chain for wood fuel biomass for heating, or is that a diminishing part of the energy mix?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

I was just reflecting on the point that Ian Forrester made about the European Union鈥檚 approach to developing policy, which involves in-depth working with scientific advisers, industry bodies, environmental non-governmental organisations and other stakeholders. Do you and the other witnesses see a mismatch or growing divergence between that well-established EU approach, which the UK was very much part of over many years, and the way in which policy is now being developed in the UK? Professor Barnard鈥檚 example of gene editing might be an interesting one to use to reflect on the robustness of the conversation that might be happening in the EU compared with what is being proposed here. Another example might relate to fisheries.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

We perhaps underestimate how much work goes into hammering out agreements across the EU. There are lessons there for us across the UK.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

Does Christina Eckes wish to come in?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

Would Fabian Zuleeg like to come in?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Continuity) (Scotland) Act 2021

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

I echo those points. It is one thing to flag up where there has been active alignment in relation to the Government鈥檚 legal duties, but it is clear that alignment goes much wider than that. An example is the Scottish Government鈥檚 future catching policy for fisheries, which is currently out for consultation. From reading through that, it appears that there is alignment with the principles of the common fisheries policy but, on looking at the detail of what is proposed, it could be argued that it is divergent on the landing obligation.

It is not clear in such consultations whether the Government seeks active divergence, and we and all committees of the Parliament absolutely need to continue to have a handle on that. That goes way beyond the reporting mechanisms that we currently have. Like other members, I hope that the Government will reflect on that, so that we do not sleepwalk in one direction or another. Such matters need to be given active consideration. Stakeholders need to be clear on where there is alignment and where it is proposed that there be divergence, and I do not think that we have clarity on that at the moment.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Role of Local Government in Delivering Net Zero

Meeting date: 24 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

We have taken evidence on the national planning framework, and there is a major tilt towards the climate and nature emergencies at that high level. I am thinking about how that translates into local development plans, which already exist and will go through a period of review and updating. How fit for purpose are the 32 local development plans across Scotland? Is there enough space and enough policy within those plans to facilitate 12GW of onshore wind or 4GW of solar energy? Are the plans fit for purpose? Is there a gap between what NPF4 says and what is actually in the 32 LDPs?

I ask Morag Watson to start. If you have examples of LDPs that are particularly facilitative of renewable energy, or of ones on which you think there is not enough action, that would be useful.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

High Speed Rail (Crewe-Manchester) Bill

Meeting date: 24 May 2022

Mark Ruskell

I presume that these would be fairly simple matters, given the size of the site and the nature of the project. For example, would the requirement for the project developer to speak to SEPA really require a huge amount of work to be done?