The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay, but this is not a bill about environmental governance; it does not touch on environmental courts or other routes to justice. There is nothing in the bill on that subject—there are no powers in it around that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, you have not had anything back from the minister. It is probably a question that we need to ask him when he appears before us.
I want to ask about the targets that are there. With regard to the marine environment, it is quite easy to make designations, but it is a very different thing to put in place the action to enforce them and to change behaviour, particularly in relation to fishing and similar operations. I am interested in your thoughts on the mismatch between making designations over a lot of Scotland but then not following through with action. Do we have the right to enforce that action on the back of designation, or are we just going to sit there looking at a whole lot of lines on the map and think, “Great, we’ve done it”? Beth Scott, do you want to come in on this? It is a pertinent issue with regard to the marine environment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Does that concern you?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I sense that before the review that Colin Church did, there was not much in the way of planning for that capacity. His review mapped out the opportunities as well as some of the concerns. Do you get a sense that there is a plan for the strategic use of incineration in Scotland held by, presumably, the Government or local authorities working together, or anywhere really? Does anybody have a plan for 2028? What happens to redundant or excess incinerator capacity? How will it be managed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Looking across the EU at the even bigger picture, are there particular areas in which we are in complete alignment at the moment? Are there areas in which we are perhaps falling behind a bit? Where are we sitting on alignment? I presume that you have this conversation fairly regularly with Environmental Standards Scotland, which maintains the monitoring of alignment. I am interested to know where you think the dial is on alignment between us and Europe.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are there particular areas in which the work of Zero Waste Scotland is leading in the UK context? Are there any colleagues down south saying that there have been leads on particular issues—the deposit return scheme, say—that they can learn from?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would you say that a lot of the evidence and prioritisation is the same across the UK? There might be differences in how policies are implemented, but everybody is facing the same issues, such as the big priorities that are in the circular economy plan—how we deal with construction waste, reduce reliance on incineration and so on. Are the problems common everywhere?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have just a couple of follow-up questions. A lot of retailers invested in reverse vending machine facilities; I go past the Aldi in Crieff every week and see the unit with the RVM in it. How much of that has been mothballed and can be brought back, and how much of it is a sunk cost?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
And it is about the deposit return scheme—a new hope, let us call it.
There is now the potential for an aligned scheme across different parts of the UK. Initially, I am interested in hearing about the role that Zero Waste Scotland has played in this next chapter, the conversations that are being had at a UK-wide level, the development of the scheme, and how the experience in Scotland of coming very close to initiating a scheme has fed into where we are right now. Also, what will be your role in the run-up to 2027—assuming, of course, that the scheme is launched, goes ahead, is not subject to lobbying and being undermined and is eventually successful? I am interested to know how you see your role not just in developing policy, but in providing on-the-ground advice to retailers and the rest of it.