The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2371 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
It might be useful for the committee to get evidence on the work programme on a third of CSOs, including the investment for that and how the work will be scheduled.
I move briefly on to a related issue, which is water quality. Douglas Millican said earlier that Scotland鈥檚 water quality is excellent. Despite that, however, Environmental Standards Scotland, as part of its sector review, highlighted the fact that a number of the river basin management plan targets have been missed, and that we still have an issue with barriers to fish and lamprey migration, along with a number of other issues relating to the operation of Scottish Water assets.
How do you prioritise environmental compliance? I give you the example of Loch Venachar. I am aware that SEPA wrote you a letter last month confirming that four of your fish passes, not on the side channel but on the main channel, are not compliant with your permit. You are in effect acting outwith your permit conditions鈥攊n other words, you are operating illegally. How seriously do you take environmental compliance?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
It is clear that the regulations are about resourcing the applications system in a better way, and I note the move to full cost recovery. The question is: what will they do to performance? According to evidence that the industry has given the committee, it can take seven years for an application to be determined. The whole system is very slow, whether it be applications going to councils, going to the planning division of planning or going through the system of environmental appeals in the Scottish Government. Will these regulations make a significant difference to those timescales for determination? We are in a climate emergency, and we need business certainty. Applications need to be approved or rejected on a reasonable timescale, so will the regulations properly resource the decision-making structure and process?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
It is a slightly different question, convener. I will be very quick. I want to ask Johanna Dow about the privatised market for the billing and sale of water to business customers. Do you feel that that is working? Have there been efficiencies? Could you operate just as effectively as a state monopoly?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
That is useful context but, to come back to the question, I asked you specifically about the figure of 3 per cent. Is that enough? Do you have a figure for how many combined sewer overflows you should be monitoring in order to capture that environmental impact and to understand it?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
You have given me a proportion there鈥攜ou said that you will move towards introducing monitoring on a third of overflows. What about the two thirds that are not monitored? Are you saying that those are not problematic? How do you know that they are not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
I have no concerns about supporting the Scottish statutory instrument; the question is more about what it is trying to achieve and what the outcome will be. I expect that the outcome will be better timescales for determination, but I would like to know from the Government whether that will actually happen.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
I have one final question. You have referenced Dr Whitten鈥檚 excellent report for the committee. In it, she has highlighted the potential for passive divergence, particularly with tertiary law鈥攖hat is, the implementation of European Union law. Have you made a commitment to that tertiary law?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
I am sure that we will come back to that when we receive the Government鈥檚 response to that piece of work.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
Obviously, the bigger question is the retained EU law bill and how that stakeholder engagement can realistically happen, given the immense scope and nature of the work that will potentially have to take place over the next 12 months. Do you have further thoughts on how you can engage stakeholders in thematic areas as we potentially approach that black cliff edge? Obviously, in Europe, that process is happening the whole time, because there is on-going stakeholder engagement. At this point, how do you reach out to groups and stakeholders on the totality of that EU law?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Mark Ruskell
I have a couple of follow-up questions. In relation to the public consultation on the annual report, I presume that, if people have concerns about the decision that was made on EVs鈥攐r anything else that is in the detail of the report鈥攖hey can make submissions to that consultation. Is that right? Are you looking for active engagement on the Government鈥檚 decisions through the consultation, or does it have a different focus? What happens to the responses that come in? Do they get passed to the relevant cabinet secretary? What is the process for stakeholders?