The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that most of the other witnesses were nodding at that, but does anyone have another view?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
My question is on carbon capture and storage. The new Scottish climate change plan will come on the back of the carbon budget. The previous plan had quite a heavy reliance on CCS and Acorn. Do you think that that will change with the new climate change plan? We are aware of the track 1 and track 2 issues around delays, but has anything else changed in the past couple of years in relation to the prioritisation of CCS and its contribution within the climate change plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would you say that the project willow projects broadly align with what you see as being the priority sectors going forward? Is anything missing there? It is all about hard-to-abate sectors and derivatives. Are those projects aligned to where you think the markets need to go?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you. Hannah, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
No.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. That is the pitch. I have heard that quite a few times before, but I am interested in the reality of where that now sits within the climate change plan. The previous climate change plan relied quite heavily on having CCS up and running by now, or very soon, to meet the 2030 targets. The Climate Change Committee warned that we would need to have a plan B, but that never came.
Leaving aside the strong arguments that you put forward, I am interested in where CCS now sits in terms of being deployable on the ground and able to capture carbon at an efficient rate. When will that happen? How much reliance on it should there be in the plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. You think that it is not about the timescale for deployment but is more about how the CCC is modelling residual emissions. Are you saying that we are on track with that and the other track 1 projects?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I do not know whether any of you has a view on the uncertainty around global markets for derivatives. Derivatives are quite easy to transport. Will we end up in the same situation that we are in with other sectors, whereby somebody comes in, undercuts us and takes the bottom out of the market that we were hoping for? Do any of you have views on the risks and uncertainties? Professor Haszeldine, you suggested that we should not build a pipeline but should focus on manufacturing things. If we are in a global market, is there the certainty for us to do that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
We will probably come back to that in future questions.
Sean Black, you touched on what appears to be a lack of evidence of the animal welfare implications. I assume that the RSPCA is not in a position right now to update its salmon farming certification in order to allow the certification of salmon farms that are located in an offshore environment, because you do not have that data and you therefore cannot set the standards. Is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
You just said that you are not ready to move into the offshore environment.