The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I have a quick question. Tim Dumenil mentioned Mossmorran. How do you see Mossmorran potentially fitting in with the hydrogen options from project willow?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I think that Professor Andresen was talking about CHP systems that were set up on the back of existing industrial sites, which is quite a niche application.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I will bring in Tim Dumenil in a second, but I was struck by something that Lewis Elder said earlier. The potential demand for all the project willow projects would be around 20GW of generation to do the electrolysis and create the hydrogen.
Does that conflict with what you said earlier about blending hydrogen into the gas grid? If we have the demand for a huge amount of power to produce as hydrogen—and potentially we cannot meet all the projects that could be developed through project willow—why would we then want to put it into the gas grid? Surely we should focus the hydrogen production on two or three applications coming out of project willow. Are you making the case for blending hydrogen into the gas grid as a way of pump priming things? If you are, how do you get out of that to use the hydrogen where you really want to put it, which might be in a fertiliser factory or some other form of derivative manufacture where you do not have any alternative but to use hydrogen because electric will not cut it? Does that make sense?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
The concern, though, would be that we then build in dependence on natural gas, which will be 90 per cent of what flows through the pipes—10 per cent might be hydrogen. If this is seen as a transition, how do you make sure that there actually is a transition, rather than effectively locking in dependency?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
No, I am fine.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Thanks. Stuart, do you want to comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks for those answers.
Going back to hydrogen, I would like to ask a question that I asked the first panel, about which sectors we should prioritise for hydrogen use. We have had some discussion, in the past couple of weeks, about the potential to bring back fertiliser manufacturing, and we have talked about hard-to-abate sectors in particular. There has been some discussion about the wider use of hydrogen in heating and its applicability or otherwise. I am interested in your thoughts on that.
Mercedes, you are nodding. Would you like to come back in on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Stuart, do you want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I want to hear some more of your reflections on the sectors that you think should be the priority for hydrogen use. You will be aware that there has been some discussion of an appropriate hierarchy of hydrogen use, and Tim Dumenil has already talked about the right-use case for hydrogen and really drilling down into those sectors.
From your earlier comments, Mark, I take it that you see no use for hydrogen in the domestic heating sector. Is that right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, which sectors should be prioritised for hydrogen use?