The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2374 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
Great. I will go back to the points that Phil Raines raised around critical detail, which was a feature of the UK CCC鈥檚 comments. Can you give us a bit more explanation? When it comes to the individual policies listed in the climate change plan, will it be really clear what the expected reduction in emissions will be, and what underlying modelling and assumptions have been used? In previous climate change plans it has been almost impossible to see what is going on behind the assumptions, particularly because of the use of the TIMES model. Previous cabinet secretaries have said that it is incredibly complex and they cannot explain it because it is a big computer model.
How clear will the plan be to people looking through it, in particular for sectors that will have to make quite big reductions in emissions and respond to the opportunities around heat and other areas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
It is something of a relief that we are now looking at only nine pieces of legislation in schedule 1 rather than, potentially, 4,000. That would have given this committee quite a job to do, as well as the Government.
The UK Government proposes to revoke the entire national air pollution control programme. What are the Scottish Government鈥檚 particular concerns about the loss of that legal air quality framework?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
So the plan will just go.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Am I right that its use will be phased out by 2025 anyway?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
It would be useful to get a written response on the corridor review of the A96, because, as I understand it, there are multiple options there, including the completion of a number of bypasses.
I want to take to the skies, cabinet secretary, and ask you about the aviation strategy. How will the aviation strategy dovetail with the climate change plan? I think that the aviation strategy was due earlier this year. We have seen a post-Covid bounceback in aviation and I am sure that the aviation sector would like a bye鈥攊t would like to see an increased number of flights and of passengers. How do we square that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
Does that mean that aviation emissions are going to drop鈥攋ust as they are going to have to drop on the A9 and A96 and in farming and every other sector of our economy鈥攐r are they going to grow?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
So it could be that other sectors or other parts of the transport sector might need to have steeper reductions in emissions in order to deliver the benefits that aviation鈥擺Inaudible.]
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
I am content with that course of action. It is a slightly odd situation because of the defence-related nature of the chemical鈥檚 use. There is a lack of transparency there. Bob Doris鈥檚 points on that are well made. Perhaps there will be an issue about ensuring that there is adequate opportunity for scrutinising how the Ministry of Defence applies environmental management and wider health and safety requirements.
We are taking it on trust that there is a defence-related use of the chemical and that it will be dealt with in a responsible way, but there is no real way for us to scrutinise that. It is worth putting on the record that this is not the only area that I have come across in this committee and in predecessor committees where environmental regulation has come up against a defence exemption. You are left wondering what the actual protocols and protections are for workers and the environment in the Ministry of Defence and related industries.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
What route do Scottish Government ministers have to remove that air quality legislation from schedule 1? My understanding is that, in effect, it is a shared area of policy between the UK and Scottish Governments. What is the mechanism for removing it? Will it now go into a common framework conversation? The clock is ticking鈥攁s I understand it, we only have until 31 October at the latest, and there are summer recesses. We do not want this to fall off a cliff. What does the conversation look like?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 June 2023
Mark Ruskell
Am I right to say that PFOA is what is known as a forever chemical and that those are being banned under the regulation on the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals? Is PFOA scheduled for withdrawal from the market under the REACH regulation?