The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2063 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Indeed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
The matter came up in the evidence on the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
You have spoken about decisions on lotting embedding the public interest. Does that mean that particular obligations and conditions should be applied to lotted land?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, it will be implicit within a lotting decision that there will be land management that is different from how the land was managed previously. I am still struggling to see how ownership will deliver on aspects such as the public interest.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
This is probably the final question鈥攊f there is time, convener. It is about your relationship with other stakeholders, Dr Dixon. We now have the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland, which presumably drives quite a lot of referrals to ESS; there was also the work that ESS did鈥攚ith, I think, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities鈥攁round reporting scope 3 emissions. There was perhaps a different interpretation about what was appropriate there. Do you have any comments or thoughts about how those more challenging stakeholder relationships are working and how you wish to progress and develop them? To summarise, I guess that there will be those that want you to go faster and those that want you to go a wee bit slower.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
However, if good practice has been stuck to, you would not envisage that being part of a compensation claim.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you believe that that issue has been largely resolved or is in the process of being resolved and that a legislative change is therefore not required?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, I am content to agree to it. We are where we are. However, there is a risk of the regulation having to be brought back again, for the Government to amend the amendment on the basis of there having been another international conversation. It seems like a bit of a waste of time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I was struck by your initial comments, Richard, about the big challenges in making sure that there is a climate change plan that delivers for Scotland鈥檚 potential role under the proposed natural environment bill and around unanswered questions about environmental governance. However, there is a whole range of other issues as well. You mentioned seal scarers in fish farms, and the whole raft of regulatory reform analysis that Environmental Standards Scotland performs.
How challenging is that landscape at the moment? Week in, week out, I come across demands for reform of regulation and questions about enforcement. Most recently, we heard about the treatment of battery waste at recycling centres, which is an issue that raises questions about whether the regulations are adequate.
In a landscape in which there is such a strong demand for ESS鈥檚 services, how do you equip the organisation to deal with the breadth of that demand, to analyse whether regulations are being enforced appropriately and to consider whether they are fit for purpose in the first place?