The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I ask the cabinet secretary to reflect on the fact that it was not just the exclusion of glass that was required in the internal market act exemption; it was an alignment of the deposit value with a scheme in England that did not exist at the time. Was that not the real reason why the scheme could not go ahead at that time? It could have gone ahead without glass but not without an answer to that question, which was an unanswerable question back in June 2023. I assume that there is now certainty about what the deposit level will be in the other schemes that the Scottish scheme will have to align with.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Will EPR meet local authorities’ costs and enable them to invest in and expand glass recycling? Will a point come where it can only go so far in dealing with that line of waste?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in how the exclusion of glass affects the overall economics of the deposit and return scheme and in the impact on local authorities. Can we start with the first of those? How does the exclusion of glass impact on the economics of the DRS?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I would like to get a bit of clarity on where you see the environmental outcomes reports and the existing EIA system applying? If, for example, there were consents for onshore transmission infrastructure under sections 36 or 37 of the Electricity Act 1989, would they now go through the Westminster system of EORs, or would it be expected that EIAs will still apply?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, there will be two systems?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
You mentioned earlier the environmental outcomes and the increased emissions from not including glass in the system, so we do not need to dwell on that.
Wales is going ahead with including glass. I think that you said that that is primarily because Wales has a very high recycling rate and sees this as a way to drive it to the next level. How will the Welsh scheme be interoperable with the scheme that Scotland will now be part of? Are there discussions about how that interoperability will work and about the internal market act implications of the regulations in Wales? That is pertinent to the discussions that we had in Scotland a couple of years ago. Can Wales actually go ahead with this? Will it work with the scheme that you are now signed up to?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
If Wales is granted an internal market act exemption, it will be somewhat bittersweet for you and for the Scottish Government, but would it provide a route for you to come back at some point and include glass within a UK and Scottish scheme?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can I pick up on the council issue before you bring Haydn Thomas in? My understanding is that the inclusion of glass in the DRS would have meant that many councils could have wound down or reduced their kerbside recycling operations and saved money as a result. Are you expecting any changes due to councils having to maintain glass recycling—at a cost to them, because they do not make a profit from it—as a result of glass not being included? I am interested in where the cost will arise. Will it come to local authorities or will the extended producer responsibility kick in, with local authorities getting money for running such schemes? They will still have to collect and deal with what is a bulky, expensive and difficult-to-handle material.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Haydn, will you comment on the economics of the exclusion of glass?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I read Scotland Against Spin’s response to the committee. I think that it was possibly the only group that actually submitted evidence. I recognise that there is a concern.
I wanted to ask for your view, cabinet secretary, on whether the good practice principles on community engagement are already being adhered to or whether you can point to examples of where developers are not engaging early on with communities, not doing a pre-application consultation, not holding exhibitions, and not gathering feedback on a development application and then offering feedback to those who have put in their views as to whether, as a result of those views, changes are being made or rejected. I am interested in the development process, how communities get involved very early on and how their views are respected.
Is the current voluntary system working, or are you coming across developers who are ignoring or bypassing it and saying, “It’s fine, we will just get through with very limited consultation”? Is good practice happening widely across the industry, or is that not happening, which is why you are bringing a mandatory requirement?