The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2332 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are there any other reflections? I am particularly interested in the imperative reasons of overriding public interest鈥擨ROPI鈥攖est. Last week, a representative of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management gave an example of the test being applied in relation to a road between, I think, Mallaig and Fort William. Is the current system working well? What changes might we envisage ministers using the powers in the bill for?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you. Does Annie Breaden or Brendan Callaghan want to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Can I get some clarity on our current system or current lack of system for planning? There is a planning system out to 3 nautical miles. There is no planning system for fish farms beyond 3 nautical miles, but, if you were an innovative developer and you wanted to try to get a permission to put something beyond 3 nautical miles, which competent authority would you go to? Is that the marine directorate?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Are there other views on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have covered some of the areas that I wanted to ask about, but I want to go back to the issue of flexibility when it comes to protected sites and the very narrow potential use of the powers in the bill. Dr Leys, to what extent is NatureScot using the current powers in regulations 9D and 11? I get the impression that there is a reluctance to adjust the site network or make changes that could allow wider landscape-scale restoration. How are you using the existing system to make changes and variations where that makes sense to improve the environment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have a quick follow-up. Should part 2 be enacted, what would be ESS鈥檚 role in looking at the adequacy of existing environmental assessment regulations and habitats regulations appraisals? You will have heard the previous panel making some bespoke cases for change or adjustments. Would ESS have a role in advising ministers on what you would consider to be appropriate changes under part 2?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is that currently part of your work plan? Is it a priority at the moment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
If NatureScot does not know how to apply regulations 9D and 11, should you not ask the Scottish Government how you can adapt the site network to meet the challenges of the natural environment in the 21st century? There are powers that have not been used, and there is a bit of caution. Why can we not just work with existing powers rather than change them?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
One challenge with the bill is that we do not know exactly how the Government will use the powers, so we are all gazing into crystal balls.
Is the guidance on the site network that is available to NatureScot officers on the ground routinely updated? I hear that there is some inconsistency in the way that that is applied, which is causing issues with decisions about particular features that might be allowed to expand to other designated areas.