˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3539 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I was thinking exactly the same thing, funnily enough.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

The tax collection rate remained at 99 per cent, and the administrative cost of tax collection was £7.8 million, which represents 0.87 per cent of tax collected. In his opening statement, Aidan O’Carroll talked about how keeping those costs below 1 per cent is an important benchmark. I notice that there was quite a significant jump over a year, from £6.9 million—which represents 0.71 per cent of tax collected—to £7.8 million. In terms of tax collected, that is a 22.5 per cent increase. Will you talk us through that a wee bit? I should also say that your capital spend was down 28 per cent, by £200,000 from £700,000.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

It is 11.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Schools (Residential Outdoor Education) (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I agree with that, but does that not mean that we need there to be a capital allocation in the financial memorandum? COSLA and the Association of Directors of Education in Scotland will say that, because of the current financial challenge, that will be difficult to deliver. ADES has said:

“the financial assumptions within the Bill are well below the finances required and are not detailed enough to give confidence in the ability to deliver on the aspirations of the Bill.”

I certainly agree with your aspirations—I am sure that most people would agree with them—but it is about how they are delivered. Some of the problems that COSLA, ADES and others have raised are about those issues. COSLA has asked where the funds will be sourced from; the subject of capital makes it very nervous, because a lot of local authorities do not have significant capital budgets and, with what they have, they are thinking about using those to build new schools or to fix potholes. They would be very reluctant, I think, to spend half a million or a million pounds, or whatever it would cost, on upgrading an outdoor centre, unless they were given the money.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Schools (Residential Outdoor Education) (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Paragraph 40 of the financial memorandum says:

“In relation to cover for teachers in their absence from school, for primary schools it is reasonable to assume that teachers and support staff attending the trip may not need to be covered for at the school.”

However, ADES has said:

“Paragraph 40 is incorrect. Any young person requires education, not supervision, this must be with a General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) registered post holder, this is a genuine cost to the excursion.”

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Schools (Residential Outdoor Education) (Scotland) Bill: Financial Memorandum

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Comhairle nan Eilean Siar has said that the timescales are not possible to meet without a detailed and well-informed financial memorandum that takes account of the costs that are required to deliver on all the aspirations. It has said that many costs are dependent on third parties such as transportation providers and, of course, the outdoor education providers.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I notice that your staff numbers have gone up from 83 to 94 on average. Do you envisage the staff complement growing further, given the fact that you have the buildings levy and potentially other taxes on the horizon?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Revenue Scotland

Meeting date: 19 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I was about to go on to that. On your digital data strategy, I understand that you have

“a vision of a single end-to-end digital tax service by 2026-27”.

In September, we were in Estonia, where the authorities have already achieved that. Where are we relative to other tax administrations?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Good morning and welcome to the 31st meeting of the Finance and Public Administration Committee in 2024.

The first item on our agenda is an evidence session with the Minister for Public Finance on the draft Budget (Scotland) Act 2024 Amendment Regulations 2024. I intend to allow around 75 minutes for the session.

The minister is joined by two Scottish Government officials: Craig Maidment, senior finance manager, and Claire Hughes, head of corporate reporting. I welcome them to the meeting.

I also welcome to our deliberations members of a delegation from the Tobago House of Assembly, who are in the public gallery. I got married on the island of Tobago, which has very fond memories for me.

I invite the minister to make a short opening statement.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Kenneth Gibson

In time-honoured fashion, I will open with some questions before colleagues around the table come in.

My first comment is that the Scottish Government has pointed out that the UK Government’s autumn budget provided £1.433 billion in resource Barnett consequentials. I think committee members will be surprised that that amount is broadly in line with our internal planning assumptions and was already factored into our spending plans. Committee members were not party to any internal planning assumptions. How did the Scottish Government come to the conclusion that that was the amount of money that the UK Government was likely to allocate in Barnett consequentials?