The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4060 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What do you consider to be realistic? The Government could say that the average public sector worker in Scotland is paid £2,300 more than public sector workers down south. The sector makes up 22 per cent of the Scottish workforce compared to 17 per cent down south, so it is already a larger sector, and, relatively speaking, it is better paid. What would be realistic? The Government suggested 9 per cent over three years. Of course, inflation could be 1 per cent a year or 5 per cent a year—that is one of the obvious difficulties with multiyear settlements. What do you consider to be realistic?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Dave Moxham, you are keen to come in, and I will bring you in in a second.
Parliament is waiting with bated breath for the medium-term financial strategy—the first one for a couple of years—that will come in the next few weeks. You say in your submission:
“In recent years the MTFS hasn’t supported a more strategic approach to financial planning. Much of the blame for this lies with the previous UK Government whose fiscal policy was characterised by short-term budget decisions, a lack of spending reviews, and general contempt for the Scottish Parliament.
However, it also reflects a lack of early Scottish Government engagement with trade unions on strategic decisions about public sector resourcing and public sector pay.
Unrealistic public sector pay policy, published without the agreement of unions, has led to a regular cycle of strike ballotsâ€â€”
and so on.
You can, of course, say what you were wanting to say—that is up to you. However, can you talk us through whether such issues arise elsewhere in the UK and what you consider to be a realistic public sector pay policy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We are in public session, so, for the record, are there any specific countries that you think have got the transparency spot on—or near enough—and that we should emulate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Do you feel that the Government is not meeting those standards?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I agree. I just do not think that they are particularly small, reasonable or appropriate.
You also say that the SHRC proposed that a citizen’s version of each key document should be published. What does that mean?
10:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I said that I was going to challenge some things. The SHRC report recommends making budget publications available in an accessible, simplified format and in different languages with the participation of existing civil society groups. I understand what that means, but how would it work and what languages should the publications be available in? Who is going to want to read the Scottish budget in Hungarian, Urdu, Swahili or Spanish, for example? Surely that is just nonsense. Let us be honest: everybody in the country bar a small minority is pretty fluent in English, and I think that those who are not will have other priorities before reading the Scottish budget documents.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is interesting that committees may be somewhat loth to look at the MTFS and how it affects them. Perhaps we should look at that in the future. I feel that, when the new ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ come in next year, there should be an element of induction in some of those areas to let them know what we are talking about. There is not much point if only 10 or 20 per cent of the Parliament is debating those issues effectively.
On how effective current public engagement is, you say:
“the Scottish Government has made some progress in making the budget process more transparent over the last four years but is still failing to reach standards considered adequate by international best practice and ... greater budget transparency is needed to realise human rights.â€
What country or countries would you say are the gold standard in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is a politician’s answer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I was not sure whether that would be the case.