The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I was in India last year and, in Delhi, I met people in fintech and from Tata and a number of organisations. SDI has only two staff in Bombay, which is in a country of 1.5 billion people with an economy that is growing 7 per cent a year. Last year, India had 139 unicorns with $1 billion or more of start-up investment. Do you not feel that our overseas presence is too light in such emerging economies and that opportunities are perhaps being missed as a result?
10:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
It is a nice segue.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. Which of our two Alastairs wants to go next?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
That £2.8 trillion is almost Michelle Thomson’s bank balance.
What do you think, Dr McInroy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
For example, some public sector departments might spend a much higher percentage on administration, if they want to call it that, than others.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Conversely, in its submission, the Scottish Partnership for Palliative Care said:
“Although assisted dying may lead to some savings ... it is important to remember that additional costs may be incurred in one service/setting whilst savings accrue elsewhere without a mechanism to redistribute funds between siloed budgets.”
It goes on to say:
“Assisted dying may be experienced as an unfunded additional demand locally, although there may be net savings across the system.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I think that that is taken on board. From our perspective, the issue is just that no cost has been identified.
I will ask only one more question at this point, because colleagues are keen to come in. Living and Dying Well has said that
“Some 38% of Dutch physicians have sought emotional support after approving a request for an AD, and there will likely be cases where healthcare workers in Scotland need time to recover after participating in the process”,
but the financial memorandum does not seem to provide for the cost implications of that. Obviously, if healthcare professionals are not able to work, there will be an implication for health boards.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I looked at a submission that considered costs in Canada, which suggested that £87 million was the saving in 2022. The population there is eight times that of Scotland, and it also has a different system. In Canada, 4.1 per cent of people had an assisted death, which might give you a ballpark figure.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. I have a couple of questions, the first of which is about LBTT. You expect significant growth in LBTT, from £911 million to £1,019 million. One aspect of that is the additional dwelling supplement, the rate of which will increase from 6 to 8 per cent, and the revenue from which is expected to grow by £32 million in the next financial year. Do you envisage any behavioural change as a result of that increase? There have certainly been some rumblings about that over the past few days.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Kenneth Gibson
My other question is about the labour market. On page 78, you say that you expect earnings growth in Scotland to continue to grow faster than that in the rest of the UK, and that unemployment will be lower than that in the rest of the UK, although there will be some loosening of the labour market. We discussed with the Institute for Fiscal Studies the issue that more than a quarter of people in the UK who are of working age are economically inactive, and the fact that the difference between Scotland and England in that regard is about 1 per cent. We touched on the fact that our four-year degrees might have something to do with that. I know that you, Professor Roy, have said previously that our approach takes a year out of the working life of a substantial number of the population. I am wondering what effect that has.
Also, how does Scotland’s expenditure on social security impact on the number of people who are economically inactive, if at all?