The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4060 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Ms Dunlop, since 2019,
“the Cabinet Office has run an Inquiries Unit, whose remit is for the whole of the UK, including Scotland, to help share best practice. â€
How has that impacted the sharing of best practice among on-going public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Before I open the discussion to colleagues around the table, I have one final question for you, Mr Pugh. The actions of Government departments, public bodies and others who engage with a public inquiry play a significant role and can contribute significantly to rising costs and extended timelines, which undermines inquiries’ effectiveness and public confidence. In the inquiries that you have been involved in, have you experienced that at all?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That has exhausted questions from committee members, but I have a brief question for each of you on areas that we have not touched on. The first is for you, Mr Pugh.
Interestingly, the Scottish Parliament information centre briefing that committee members received states that 45 per cent of an inquiry’s time is spent on producing the report. Is there any way in which that process could be expedited?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
My second question is for you, Ms Dunlop. Should Government departments and public bodies be required to respond formally to recommendations within a set timeframe?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What might be a reasonable timeframe in which to respond to a report?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
But does that sound to you like a conflict of interest?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Our next agenda item is the second evidence session in our inquiry into the cost-effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries.? I welcome to the meeting the Rt Hon Lord Hardie, who is the former chair of the Edinburgh tram inquiry, and Dr Emma Ireton, associate professor at Nottingham law school, Nottingham Trent University.
We will move straight to questions, because there is so much to dig into. Lord Hardie, you said that public inquiries often reinvent the wheel. Will you say a wee bit about your concerns in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
One of the issues, and the reason why we are taking this look at public inquiries and their costs, is that the costs seem to be astronomical. Not only does the timescale often run away from people, but there can be a concern that justice not only has to be done but has to be seen to be done. If inquiries take five or 10 years, or even longer on some occasions, there is an issue about that.
Lord Hardie, you have raised the issue of putting a specific budgetary limit on an inquiry. You wrote:
“This approach might undermine public confidence in the Inquiry.â€
Surely every other area of public life has a set budget to which it must operate, and indeed a timescale, although the parameters can contain an element of flexibility. You are concerned that public confidence in an inquiry might be eroded if limits were set, but surely public confidence is eroded if public inquiries seem to go on and on, year after year. People might think that an inquiry will last one, two or three years, but they might still be waiting for an outcome after five, six, seven or eight years.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Sorry—that question is for Dr Ireton.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. I will now open up the session to members.