The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that opening statement. I am sure that the SFC’s chair, Graeme Roy, will be delighted to be described as
“a seasoned and effective communicator”.
I am sure that we all agree with that.
The report is excellent and really well put together. On page 8, it says that the recommendations
“position the institution to have an important role in empowering political and public understanding around budget choices at a time when Scotland’s fiscal context will become increasingly challenging.”
Obviously, that is quite a sensitive issue in politics. How do you suggest that the SFC can do that in a non-partisan way, or in a way that is seen to be non-partisan?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I like the way that you say “layperson”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That concludes questions from members. I have a final question. The report’s conclusion talks about
“the SFC’s potential to go beyond its role as official economic and fiscal forecaster and help raise awareness around fiscal challenges.”
The SFC has raised awareness about climate change and sustainability and there has not really been any political kickback, because it has been able to show a degree of political neutrality. You believe that the SFC should deepen its spending analysis beyond social security to offer more comprehensive insights into public spending trade-offs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Are there any more points that you want to make to wind up the session?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What should be the priorities for your successor?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We move to questions from members, beginning with Liz Smith, to be followed by Ross Greer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I think that we have been very fair and very open.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The next agenda item is an evidence session with the Minister for Public Finance on the Scottish Landfill Tax (Standard Rate and Lower Rate) Order 2025. The minister is joined today by Jonathan Waite, the Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill team leader at the Scottish Government. I welcome them both and invite the minister to make a short opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
People have suggested in evidence that, notwithstanding that, there is an issue about the requirement for more capital investment. Clearly, if the bill goes through, there will be a right to recovery. You talk in the financial memorandum about publicising that, trying to reduce stigma and getting more people to come forward. There is a fear that there could be an upsurge in the number of people coming forward and that, even though the Scottish Government is going up to 650 beds, that will not be enough.
Paragraph 38 in the financial memorandum states:
“The average cost of a placement in a core programme in rehab in Scotland is £18,112”.
I understand how difficult it is to put together a financial memorandum on the issue, but it says that placement costs range from ÂŁ6,504 to ÂŁ27,500, for varying lengths of courses, and that the cost per week is ÂŁ350 to ÂŁ5,500. If there is an upsurge, there will be extra demand on private places as well, which I assume the Scottish Government would be expected to fund under the bill. The Scottish Government could be funding private places at ÂŁ5,000-plus per week. As demand goes up, we could end up with costs rising exponentially because of such issues. How do you address that concern?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Do you feel that the financial memorandum reflects that? The evidence suggests that it does not. Finding people to do the work is one of the issues. Even if the Scottish Government had unlimited cash resources, it would still have to find people and train them to the required standard in order to deliver the outcomes that we would like to see.
Paragraph 85 of the financial memorandum says that
“the implementation of the Bill will lead to more completed treatments. This in turn will mean fewer repeat appointments being needed for patients who are seeking a new treatment, having had an unsuccessful patient journey.”
If staff numbers across Scotland are going to need to significantly increase, some staff will not have the same experience as those who work for organisations that have worked in the field for years or even decades. You are suggesting that the bill will lead to better outcomes, but I am not sure that we have the evidence that that will be the case, as some people will not have the same level of experience.