The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
On the wider budget process and our call for evidence, we asked in question 4 how the MTFS is currently used by parliamentary committees. From your answer, which is quite detailed, it appears that you have completely body-swerved that part of the question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is very clear in your document. You raised concerns about that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There is a concern about how the outcomes tie in with what the Government professes to wish to deliver.
The MTFS is a significant part of your submission. You talk about improvements that have been made, such as in quantifying the projected fiscal gap over the medium term. What other significant improvements would you like to see in the medium-term financial strategy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You touched on the programme for government. Do the budget and the programme for government align strongly enough?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We have no idea what is in it, by the way.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Is the Government too easily put off course by events? It has talked about the general election. It seemed understandable to me, noting the advice that was given by the permanent secretary, that the Government should not publish the MTFS. I am not convinced that many of my constituents would have been influenced as to how to vote by the MTFS, to be honest. There is a difference between delaying something because of a general election and still waiting for it a year later. Even if there is an element of flexibility for certain events, should the arrangements be less flexible than they currently appear to be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. The first thing that I want to talk about is the significant difference of opinion between you and the Institute for Fiscal Studies. In your submission, you said that
“the Scottish Government should publish its financial and infrastructure medium-term strategies at the earliest opportunity.”
However, in his evidence, David Phillips from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said that
“the Scottish Parliament has welcomed and indeed pushed for this timing”
which is May 2025,
“as the earliest practical opportunity to publish an MTFS. In my view, this publication date is a mistake. I would have preferred to see the MTFS published after the summer recess, and after the UK government’s multi-year Spending Review (set to be published less than two weeks after the MTFS, on June 11th)”.
Why do you think that the MTFS should be published at the earliest opportunity when the IFS, which, unfortunately, is not giving evidence this morning, so we cannot ask it directly, thinks the opposite?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I was hoping that you would. [Laughter.]
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You talked about institutional structure. Is there any way in which that can be improved?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is difficult for both the OBR and the SFC, but we need to look at whether it is possible to reduce the gaps.
In your submission, you said:
“Differences in modelling approaches, data used, and judgements applied can all contribute to differences between our and the SFC’s forecasts.”
How can those differences in modelling and data use be reduced?