The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4060 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You touched on the invest to save fund, which I was going to ask about anyway. Witnesses were very supportive of the fund, but they said that £30 million is not enough to do more than scratch the surface, that you really need a bigger fund if you are going to make fundamental change, and that the more that you invest to save, the more radical and swift the change is likely to be. Are those fair comments?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Does that seem reasonable?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Joe Griffin told us in response to a question from Michelle Thompson that, out of a workforce of 7,000 people, there were 4,000 managers. It looks as if it is all chiefs and nae braves, if you know what I mean. If you are looking to improve efficiency, the civil service does seem relatively top heavy compared with other organisations.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am just thinking of Ireland. In 1986, the country was effectively a basket case, so everybody sat down and decided, “Look, this is what we need to do: focus on infrastructure and education.” Look where it has gone in the past 30 or 40 years as a result; it has had phenomenal growth and success relative to where it was.
I am now going to open up the session. I call Liz Smith, to be followed by Ross Greer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Indeed. The commission also said that the United Kingdom would not be able to meet its own climate targets without Scotland, because of the impact of peatland restoration and so on.
As for the small business bonus scheme, I would note that the Federation of Small Businesses has said that, without it, one in six of their businesses would have gone bust at the time of the financial crisis in 2008. Certainly the scheme might have a use in times of crisis.
I call John Mason, to be followed by Craig Hoy.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have just been whispering about that with the clerks. We thought we had kicked it into touch long ago.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Excuse me, how many questions are you thinking of having?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 26th meeting of the Finance and Public Administration Committee in 2025. We have received apologies from Michael Marra.
Before we start, I put on record our thanks to the Lithuanian MPs, organisations and officials who met us during our short fact-finding visit to the beautiful and extremely clean city of Vilnius last week. I have never been anywhere so immaculate.
Lithuania’s challenges are similar to those of Scotland in relation to demographics and public sector reform. We had fruitful discussions with our counterparts on long-term strategic thinking and growing the economy. We will draw on those discussions as we continue our pre-budget scrutiny, and we will publish a summary note of the visit very soon.
We have one item on today’s agenda, which is to take evidence from the Scottish Government on responding to long-term fiscal pressures. I welcome to the meeting the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, Shona Robison. The cabinet secretary is accompanied by Scottish Government officials Richard McCallum, director of public spending; Lucy O’Carroll, director of tax; and Alasdair Black, deputy director of budget and fiscal co-ordination.
I wish the cabinet secretary good morning and invite her to make a short opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Even 14 January would be better. A Thursday is a terrible day.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Kenneth Gibson
During my lifetime, we have had inventions such as the internet, email and the telephone—actually, that was before my lifetime, but it was in Liz Smith’s lifetime. I therefore do not think that it is impossible. Certainly, any step forward in progress that you could make on that would be helpful for our scrutiny.
I commend the Government for the fact that all four plans will be together. That is really important. I was going to ask you specifically about that, but you have answered the point. It will be very helpful to have all those documents together. I realise that that is also a lot of work for the Government, but it is certainly what we have been looking for.
I will get into the meat of other things that we want to discuss today. We have taken evidence on pre-budget scrutiny for a number of weeks, and one issue is prioritisation. The Government has talked about that, and you have talked today about areas of need. Again, we have found that, although it is always easy to talk about what is being prioritised, the quid pro quo is that, if you prioritise one thing, you must be deprioritising another. What is going to be deprioritised as we go forward?