The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3475 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Colleagues might wish to explore that further. We could ask about hundreds of things, and I am sure that colleagues will dig deep.
A final question from me—what is the ideal time period for a spending review? For example, Mairi, you have said that
“Spending reviews should be shorter than a Parliamentary term, allowing for changes in policy priorities midway through it.â€
What is ideal? Is it two or three years? What do you think?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The kind of induction that we get as ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ is nothing whatsoever to do with the practicalities of examining the budget—it is all weird and wonderful stuff, I have to be honest. That is an important point that we might want to add to the committee’s legacy report about what we need to see happening. The Parliament will have lots of new members, given the number of retirements and, indeed, the outcome of the upcoming election.
Mairi Spowage, do you want to make any final points? Is there anything that you feel we have not yet touched on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We need a Scottish version of Estonia’s X-Road, in my view. Craig Hoy is next.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We will have questions from Ross Greer, followed by Craig Hoy.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is not all gloom and doom. In the submission, you say that, compared with OECD countries such as Germany, Canada, the Nordics, France, Spain and the USA, Scotland scored above average on transparency and public participation, and we scored highest on budget oversight, with a score of 91 versus an average of 74. There are some areas in which the Government is doing well.
However, you go on to talk about the programme for government, and we are going to have a new programme for government—not in September, obviously, but in a couple of weeks. You say:
“What is not clear is how the PfG relates to the budget and how specific changes in budget allocations reflect PfG priorities.â€
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have probably heard, then, of a Professor Mairi Spowage, who says in her submission:
“Given that around half of Scottish Government current spending is on pay, any long-term-focused document that does not have a specific view on the size of employment and rate of growth in payroll over a number of years cannot be regarded as credible.â€
What is your view of the 3 per cent figure? Is it credible?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the 13th meeting in 2025 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee.
We continue our inquiry into the Scottish budget process in practice. Today, we will take evidence from two panels of witnesses.
First, I warmly welcome to the meeting, from the Office for Budget Responsibility, Tom Josephs, who is a member of the budget responsibility committee, and Laura Gardiner, who is the acting chief of staff. We have your written submissions, so we will move straight to questions from the committee. I will start by asking about transparency.
You have said that you have
“taken several steps that aim to specifically improve transparency around our role in the Scottish Government Budget process.â€
You touch on some of those steps in your paper, but could you elaborate on those for the record, please?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Maybe the Government will produce a strategy document to bring together all the strategy documents.
David, we asked the OBR about the fact that the UK spending review will be a comprehensive, zero-based review. What are the implications of that for Scotland? Incidentally, we looked at that when we were in Estonia and we found it quite a fascinating approach. Rather than just go on the way we have always gone, let us look at things from the bottom up and at what is really essential—what should be prioritised and so on. Obviously, you know how it all hangs together, but do you think that Scotland could benefit from such an approach?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. I note that, on your website, you also have a transcript of your dealings with this committee, so members had better behave.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What can we do to try to improve things? What can we do to ensure that committees have greater influence on the Government’s budgetary deliberations? Those questions are for both of you.