The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. I do not expect that this would transpire but if it did, in theory, no action would be taken against someone for doing that, so anyone could bring any case forward, and it would be hit or miss, so to speak.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I thank the Deputy First Minister and his officials, Lesley Fraser and Ian Mitchell, for their evidence. That concludes the public part of our meeting.
11:28 Meeting continued in private until 11:56.Ìý
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much for that opening statement. In a relatively short statement, you mentioned on three occasions that the lessons that have been learned have been put into practice. The committee and I are well aware that we are in the middle of a process, but what specific lessons have been learned so far?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Throughout the process, what steps have been taken to ensure that the procedure is lawful and conforms to natural justice?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
One issue that has not come up at the meeting but is in the implementation plan and is important is the information management review and the need to improve the quality of digital storage and retrieval processes. That is perhaps not the most exciting issue that has been raised but it is critical. The Government’s response has five bullet points that list the steps that should be taken on it. Will you talk to us about the philosophy behind why that is important to the process?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
According to the draft procedure,
“For complaints which are not upheld, this could include actions to resolve remaining issues informally or other management actions.â€
What sort of actions would be contemplated?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Why did you decide on six months instead of three months or a year, for example? Is there a specific reason?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that clarification. Are the definitions of bullying and harassment that are detailed in the ministerial code and for staff who work with ministers clearly explained to ministers and civil servants, and will they be updated as the procedures develop?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Liz Smith was cut off in her prime earlier, so I will allow her back in for a question before we move on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Good morning, and welcome to the first meeting in 2022 of the Finance and Public Administration Committee. I wish everyone a happy new year. We are meeting remotely today.
The single item on our agenda involves taking evidence from two panels of witnesses to inform our consideration of the forthcoming independent report on Scotland’s fiscal framework. Although the terms of reference and authorship of the report have yet to be agreed by the United Kingdom and Scottish Governments, we know that it will focus on block grant adjustments.
First, we will hear from Professor David Bell, David Eiser and David Phillips. David Phillips will join us a little later, at about 10.15 am. Our second panel will focus on arrangements for the Welsh fiscal framework approach to block grant adjustments, and Dr Ed Poole and Guto Ifan from Cardiff University will join us.
I welcome Professor Bell and David Eiser to the meeting. We have about 70 minutes for the discussion. I remind members that broadcasting staff will operate their microphones, so please allow a few moments before speaking to ensure that you will be heard. Members who wish to ask a supplementary question and witnesses who wish to respond should type R in the chat function, and I will bring them in.
I will begin the questioning. What should the independent review cover, and what should be the terms of reference for the independent report? Perhaps Professor Bell can go first.