The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3475 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thanks very much.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I realise that I have been asking questions for quite a while now—I apologise to colleagues for that. I will ask one more and then I will let everyone else in. There is another really interesting but depressing statistic in paragraph 4.48 in the report:
“Disability prevalence has risen from 19 per cent of the UK population in 2002-03 to 27 per cent of the population by 2022-23.”
Do your projections expect that trend to continue, to stay the same or to reverse?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The next item on our agenda is to take evidence on the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s “Fiscal Sustainability Report”, which was published on 8 April 2025, and which has a particular focus on health.
I welcome to the meeting, from the Scottish Fiscal Commission, Professor Graeme Roy, chair; Professor Francis Breedon, commissioner; Dr Caroline Carney, senior analyst; and Claire Murdoch, head of fiscal sustainability and public funding.
Before we move to questions, I invite Professor Roy to make a brief opening statement.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The SFC witnesses are sitting right behind you, so I am glad that you are saying that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In your evidence earlier, you raised the issue of technology. You talked about reform and how technology can help to reduce costs for the Scottish Government. On page 55 of the Scottish Fiscal Commission’s sustainability document, on health, the SFC assumes that healthcare costs will increase by 1 per cent every year for the next half century, and it talks about the Baumol effect, due to healthcare being labour intensive, and long-term conditions. It also says that 0.13 percentage points of that cumulative increase in annual spend over 50 years—which is clearly a lot—
“captures the effect of technological advancements on healthcare costs.”
The SFC also says:
“Developments in medical devices, techniques, and procedures tend to push up costs, or where costs are reduced, can result in the expansion of treatments.”
Therefore, is it the case that technology does not always deliver the savings that one might look for?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Do you feel that the Government is not meeting those standards?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I agree. I just do not think that they are particularly small, reasonable or appropriate.
You also say that the SHRC proposed that a citizen’s version of each key document should be published. What does that mean?
10:00Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I said that I was going to challenge some things. The SHRC report recommends making budget publications available in an accessible, simplified format and in different languages with the participation of existing civil society groups. I understand what that means, but how would it work and what languages should the publications be available in? Who is going to want to read the Scottish budget in Hungarian, Urdu, Swahili or Spanish, for example? Surely that is just nonsense. Let us be honest: everybody in the country bar a small minority is pretty fluent in English, and I think that those who are not will have other priorities before reading the Scottish budget documents.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is interesting that committees may be somewhat loth to look at the MTFS and how it affects them. Perhaps we should look at that in the future. I feel that, when the new ˿ come in next year, there should be an element of induction in some of those areas to let them know what we are talking about. There is not much point if only 10 or 20 per cent of the Parliament is debating those issues effectively.
On how effective current public engagement is, you say:
“the Scottish Government has made some progress in making the budget process more transparent over the last four years but is still failing to reach standards considered adequate by international best practice and ... greater budget transparency is needed to realise human rights.”
What country or countries would you say are the gold standard in that regard?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is a politician’s answer.