The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3475 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Right, so you are talking about a 5 per cent gap.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
One of your suggestions—indeed, it is also in the main COSLA submission—is about multiyear settlements. I think that committee members round the table are really sympathetic to and supportive of such an approach for local government. Of course, the issue is that the Scottish Parliament does not have such settlements, which makes it difficult for us, especially given the proportion of resource that goes to local government.
Two weeks ago, I had a private meeting with representatives of the Accounts Commission. When it gives evidence, it always talks about long-term planning. Most local authorities, although not all, are involved in medium to long-term planning. What work is COSLA doing on long-term financial planning?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I have a follow-on question. One way to look at potential costs is to consider the position in reverse. I was a councillor when Strathclyde region was abolished in 1995, when we went from having one social work department in the region to having 12. Each local authority suddenly had 12 directors of social work and 12 deputy directors and all the rest of it. If you looked at the cost of setting up shared services, it would be interesting to see what the potential savings would be.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. That has exhausted the committee’s questions, so I will wind up the session. I remind colleagues that we will be back in our usual Tuesday morning slot next week, when we will continue to take further evidence on Scotland’s public finances in 2023-24. I thank our witnesses for their participation this afternoon.
Meeting closed at 17:40.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
The transient visitor levy—the tourist tax, as it is called—might be good news for Argyll and Bute, but I cannae see North Lanarkshire making much out of it. There is a real issue in the fact that it will be very uneven when it comes to which local authorities benefit from that and which do not. That will also have to be taken into consideration in deliberations on funding.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
In your written submission, you said that we need “frank discussions” about what needs to be “deprioritised” in the public sector. What needs to be deprioritised?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Yes—it is from the third line down in paragraph 40.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that. The issue that the Finance and Public Administration Committee faces is that everyone we take evidence from suggests that they should have more money for their particular area. We are always asking how that can be funded, because it is either through additional taxation or from other sections of the budget. It is helpful when people suggest that money spent on A is more effective for the public pound than money spent on B.
You talked about a whole-systems approach and your submission mentions
“a more collaborative approach to budget setting”.
How do you see that working in practice? Are you suggesting that the Scottish Government should work with COSLA or local government when it creates the budgets, or should that collaboration come at a later stage in the process?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thanks—that is very helpful.
Mr Manning, in case you feel neglected, I am going to ask you about a number of things. One is that COSLA’s submission says that the national care service
“poses a risk to councils’ ability to deliver a wide range of services for communities”.
Does South Lanarkshire Council agree with that? If so, which services and in what way?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Kenneth Gibson
You are asking the question. Can you give us the answer? You are giving us an almost rhetorical question, but I am keen for you to say how retaining the current structure would be beneficial.