The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3573 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
You were asked:
“If applicable, do you believe your comments on the financial assumptions have been accurately reflected in the financial memorandum”?
I found it interesting that you basically said that you did not believe that they had been. However, the Fraser of Allander Institute took the view that the
“analysis provided by the Scottish Government is reasoned and logical.”
Will Emma Congreve explain the institute’s thinking on that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you for that. You say in your submission:
“what could be the most significant”—
that great word again—
“public sector organisational change in recent memory must not be underestimated in both time, unnecessary distractions and increased costs.”
What do you mean by “unnecessary distractions”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you.
Emma, I found the Fraser of Allander Institute’s analysis quite interesting with regard to table 3 in its submission. You say:
“Decisions relating to the number of Care Boards have not yet been made, and the figures in Table 3 assume 32 are created, one for each local authority area.”
Does it seem efficient to you to go from 32 local authorities to 32 care boards? What impact would that have on delivering what the bill is ultimately setting out to do, which is to ensure high and consistent quality of care across Scotland?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Do you have a view on that, Mark?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Do you have any fears about slippage in relation to cost? For example, it was indicated that the programme business case would be provided in the autumn, but we have not seen those figures yet, and they might or might not be available. Is it a worry that there might be slippage in cost and that the whole delivery might be delayed?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Yes, it does. I will follow on from that and move things on a wee bit. Your submission says:
“The ALLIANCE ... supports Volunteer Scotland’s calls to ensure that volunteers—while a valuable asset to the health and social care landscape—are not expected to substitute for paid care provision.”
Is there any indication that that is being considered?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
I will let colleagues come in in a minute or two. Although I have given you quite a barrage of questions, there are huge areas that we have not touched on. I will ask one more question to Ralph Roberts, Mark Taylor and Emma Congreve, and then I will open up the session. Ralph, the potential for efficiency savings has been spoken about but, in your written submission, you said that
“it would be difficult to find additional efficiency savings”.
If those cannot be found, must the Scottish Government make a commitment to meet the cost, or should the cost be shared? Do you hope that efficiency savings can somehow be found? If so, where could they possibly be found?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
It does—thank you.
Mark, you commented that paragraph 51 of the financial memorandum
“provides details of the components of core management costs assessed, but the subsequent analysis does not provide any information against these headings.”
What level of cost could we be talking about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Emma, you say in your submission:
“The creation of an electronic integrated health and social care record is in the legislation, but no costing has been produced. The reason given is that the work is at a too early stage to estimate costs, but it will be provided in the Programme business case due in Autumn 2022.”
We are now in the autumn. Have you been advised as to when those figures will be provided, if they have not been provided already?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 1 November 2022
Kenneth Gibson
Ralph, you state in your submission:
“The purpose of creating the NCS is to improve the delivery of community health and social care together. The clear definition of community health is not evident within the Bill and therefore it is significantly more challenging to understand the financial implications on services and costs.”
What impact might that have?