The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I believe that the Sheku Bayoh inquiry has, so far, cost £17 million in legal fees alone. That means 85,000 hours for senior counsel—although they are not all senior counsel—even at £200 an hour. Eyebrows have certainly been raised over the costs of those inquiries.
Let us compare with elsewhere. Australia is not greatly different from the UK in many areas, and its Covid inquiry took 13 months and cost £4 million. New Zealand’s inquiry has been on-going for two years but it has cost £7 million so far—so a lot less than Scotland’s. Norway, Sweden and Finland have all concluded their inquiries within a year or so, so there are ways in which the process can be done more efficiently and effectively.
You have talked about an inquisitorial approach, for example. Could there also be a more standardised approach to the practicalities in relation to start-up time and reduced costs? We have already heard that the Caldwell inquiry took some 13 months to be set up after it was announced. That family had to wait day in, day out, wondering when it would happen, for more than a year. We are also aware that more than £1 million has been spent on the Eljamel case before any evidence has even been heard.
11:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
When inquiries have completed their deliberations, one area of frustration is that the report can take donkey’s years to write. You said that you tried with your report—which still took a year to write—to make the recommendations “as short as possible” and that there were eight recommendations. Some inquiries have as many as 86 recommendations and some have only one. Are you suggesting that they should try to make recommendations as punchy—for want of a better word—and impactful as possible?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There is also an issue of conflict of interest when legal firms that are directly involved in a specific inquiry are themselves suggesting a deepening and widening of that inquiry.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. That will have whetted the appetite of colleagues around the table.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. I really found this opening session of the inquiry fascinating. Would you like to add anything further to the evidence that you have provided today before we wind up, Professor Cameron?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Hold on. Excuse me for a second. We are drifting quite significantly away from the issue on which we are supposed to be taking evidence, Michael.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I have given you a bit of leeway, but we have to stick to the Scottish budget process.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. I will bring in Liz Smith, to be followed by John Mason.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It is the union dividend.
10:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I would accept that, were it not for the fact that the policy, as you put it, does not seem to change year on year. That argument does not stack up if it happens five, six or seven years in a row. Although I and the committee understand that changes must be made mid-year, which is why we have the autumn and spring revisions, I do not think that it is in any way appropriate that the same resource shifts from the same budget every year. People want to be able to track where the money goes.