成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 23 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3539 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Amendment 6, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 7 and 13.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

No member has indicated that they wish to come in. I invite the minister to wind up.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I invite the minister to wind up.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Aggregates Tax and Devolved Taxes Administration (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Amendment 21, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 22, 31 and 23 to 25.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scotland鈥檚 Commissioner Landscape

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

We have talked a lot about scrutiny. One of the issues that we have not talked about directly is sunset clauses. It has been suggested that post-implementation reviews should be carried out, along with periodic reviews, to assess whether the office holder is still relevant and required. That is not just about scrutiny on a day-to-day basis; rather, it is about whether we still need a given commissioner. The post might have been set up with a bit of verve and passion and a desire to get things done, but after 10 or 20 years鈥攑erhaps even after five years鈥攖he office might seem to be just plodding along. What is the end game for commissioners? It seems that once they are established they are with us permanently; that seems to be the situation so far. If that is not the case, sunset clauses could be brought in for new commissioners, but what about existing commissioners? Will there be any reviews to look at whether they should continue indefinitely?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scotland鈥檚 Commissioner Landscape

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Indeed.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scotland鈥檚 Commissioner Landscape

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

No, but where should the SPCB fit in?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scotland鈥檚 Commissioner Landscape

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I mean enhancements of how the scrutiny of commissioners function is undertaken.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scotland鈥檚 Commissioner Landscape

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

I am getting the feeling that you are of the view that the Government does not have a lot to say on this. What is the Government鈥檚 overall role in relation to commissioners? You talked about the ones that the Government is proposing, but, as for others, you said in your opening statement that that is up to the Parliament. Do you feel that the Government should have no role in that, even to encourage or discourage?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scotland鈥檚 Commissioner Landscape

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Kenneth Gibson

Let us say that someone comes forward with a suggestion for a commissioner for older people, for example, which has been suggested, as I have mentioned, and they refer to the fact that we do not have a minister for older people or even a ministerial title that includes older people. In other words, they feel that older people are not getting the attention that they deserve. Does the Government look at that and say that there is an issue and a gap to be closed? What is the Government鈥檚 response to that?

I am not asking whether it will agree or disagree with a proposal for a specific commissioner. I want to know what the Government does in looking at the reasons for a commissioner being proposed in a specific area. Does it think that it needs to do something about that, because something is not transpiring in the way that it should be, which is creating enough momentum for people to drive forward with such a suggestion?