The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3475 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Last year, the cost of the child abuse inquiry was £968,277. Surely that level of cost must make it more difficult for you to deliver the other services that the COPFS should deliver.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Ministers take advice. The Sheku Bayoh inquiry was launched because of advice from your office and the Lord Advocate.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We are hoping to see that in September. Have you had any indication of when you are likely to see it? Might it be before then?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thanks very much. A number of colleagues are keen to come in.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
When inquiries such as the Emma Caldwell inquiry or Sheku Bayoh inquiry take place, police resources are really impacted. Other inquiries—the Eljamel inquiry, for example—require NHS resources. Whether or not we have the same inquiry model in place, is there an argument for a completely ring-fenced fund to pay for public inquiries, so that specific service budgets are not impacted?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am sorry to cut across you, but this is about not only cost but cost-effectiveness. There is not a lot of point in having an inquiry and making recommendations if nothing happens. In the first evidence session of our inquiry, Professor Cameron said that some recommendations that were made in the Jersey inquiry had first been made in 1945, in the very first child abuse inquiry, and still had not been implemented.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Did the Chhokar case take a year, from 2000 to 2001?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Our long-term historical average will change if we are stuck with low growth, according to your projections. We are nowhere near where we were before the financial crash in 2007-08. It seems like we are still trying to recover from that situation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In paragraph 4.18 of the report, you say:
“The Income Tax net position is projected to be £616 million in 2025-26, which is £222 million lower than the December 2024 projection.â€
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Do you think that there should be cost controls? Mr Kennedy has made a couple of helpful suggestions. Every other area of the public sector, whether it is the police, the NHS or local government, has a budget and is expected to deliver on it. However, it seems to me that inquiries are almost open ended. The Sheku Bayoh inquiry has gone on for six years. There should be an assessment at the outset of what the opportunity cost will be, for want of a better phrase. If resources are being taken away from the police to put into an inquiry that may or may not come to a conclusion in a few years’ time, and that may or may not produce recommendations that may or may not be implemented, should there not be a comparison of the costs? There is also an implication for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, relative to other areas where public money should be spent. Is that not something that you think should take place?