The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1467 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Are there any limitations on the sources of information for that process that the Scottish Prison Service pursues to ensure that it has the broadest possible perspective on the history of an individual and the risk that they might pose to any other prisoner or member of staff in the Scottish Prison Service?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
I would like to follow up on the point that Russell Findlay has been raising with Teresa Medhurst in relation to the discretion that is provided for governors to opt for a search to be undertaken by an officer of the individual鈥檚 original gender. I wonder whether Teresa Medhurst could put on the record the approach that she envisages that a governor would take in fulfilling the statutory obligation in the instruments that the committee is considering this afternoon, particularly in the scenario that Mr Findlay put, where an officer has concerns about what they are being asked to do.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Would you say that what is in front of the committee today is a strengthening of the obligation on governors to ensure that the perspectives and concerns of members of staff are addressed to a greater extent, with greater obligation, than was the case before?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Thank you for that. Would you accept that the instrument on the prison rules that the committee is looking at this afternoon places an obligation on the governor to ensure that, in their institution, there is an appropriate opportunity for a member of staff to raise their concerns and have them properly and fully addressed? Would you accept that that is required of the governor as a consequence of them being allocated the discretionary power in question?
13:30Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
I will move on to the ground that the convener started on, which is the risk assessment that is undertaken. Can you explain to the committee the degree of rigour, and the scope, of the risk assessment that is carried out in those circumstances and whether that rigour and scope are applied to any other scenarios in the Scottish Prison Service?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Convener, it is difficult to hear the witness when there are conversations going on to my left. I want to concentrate on what Ms Medhurst has to say to us.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
John Swinney
Your answer opens up a wider question. Much of this concerns how court proceedings are handled, but an awful lot of it is about a whole-justice-system approach: it is about the actions of Police Scotland, the operation of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service and the roles of the Crown, defence agents, the Faculty of Advocates, the Law Society of Scotland and, ultimately, the judiciary, in shepherding the process. There are quite a number of players.
I am struck by how, in order to eradicate delay in the system, everybody needs to improve their performance and to act more quickly and more effectively. What is the best means of driving that? It strikes me that all those organisations鈥擯olice Scotland, the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, the Crown, practitioners and the judiciary鈥攁re self-governing institutions, so who drives the process? The Government will be criticised if it drives it too aggressively, because that would be interference. Where, within the system, will the necessary drive to eradicate the delays come from?
To put it in a better way, how can we ensure that those various players, who are all critical in the process, are focused on eradication of delays?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
John Swinney
Lord Advocate, a comment that you made in response to Russell Findlay鈥檚 questions this morning鈥攊n relation to your point about the difference between the views about the system that have been expressed by Rape Crisis Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates鈥攚as that, in your judgment, the ordinary adversarial approach is not suited to cases of this type. I will explore that comment, because, in a sense, it gets to the heart of some of the points that I explored with Lady Dorrian about court culture. I am interested to know the nature of the changes that need to take place in a specialist sexual crimes court and what approaches are necessary for living up to the challenge that you set out in your comment that the ordinary adversarial approach is not suited to such cases. What needs to be different?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
John Swinney
That would be helpful. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2024
John Swinney
Can you share with the committee any data on the level of spare capacity in the court and tribunal infrastructure in Scotland? What is the utilisation level of the court infrastructure in the country?