成人快手

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 22 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 841 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

What will be the intended process for actually retaining law? We have talked about the scale of all this, but what does that actually mean? What is the process for saving a piece of legislation as currently construed by the bill?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

That was very helpful.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

We have heard that the Soil Association has concerns, too. David, can you say a bit more about the impact of losing some of the regulatory or legal environment on water quality and pesticides?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

I want to follow up on that point. RSPB Scotland made a point about uncertainty in its evidence, and about the fact that although ministers have given reassurances about the devolution settlement in various pieces of UK legislation, there is the chilling effect that you just talked about.

How can we have certainty? I will go to Isobel Mercer first. Reassurances have been given in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill and in the Environment Act 2021. However, if those are just words, what will be the legal impact, given the uncertainty and bodies not being prepared to push the envelope because they are worried about legal status?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

But if all that is going to be implemented on the ground, what will be the reality check?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

Professor Reid, do you want to come in on that point? Your evidence about the sheer scale of the legislation on the environment alone is really quite powerful.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

We have been told that the dashboard is not up to date. Do you have any comment on that from a legal perspective?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 1 December 2022

Sarah Boyack

Thank you. That was really helpful. It is very much what the Law Society of Scotland said when we discussed the matter a couple of weeks ago.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 24 November 2022

Sarah Boyack

I was hoping to bring in Sarah Millar, who talked about possible confusion, given the sheer range of legislative change. I note that you also highlighted food safety, Sarah. Can you comment on that?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 24 November 2022

Sarah Boyack

From reading your submissions and listening to you today, it is clear that 2023 would be a massive cliff edge and that 2026 would still be a cliff edge, because it is not that far off.

What do the witnesses think about taking the opposite approach, which I think one of you mentioned, whereby, instead of dumping everything, we keep everything and then decide what we want to get rid of for flexibility? That would be a much more prioritised and much less risky approach, which would give you the opportunity to seek opportunities rather than taking the risk of putting environmental health, human health or animal health at risk as a result of huge uncertainty.