The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ³ÉÈË¿ìÊÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 836 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
I very much agree with Mark Ruskell’s points. The committee’s evidence sessions on the topic in previous weeks have been useful in considering how to make buses more accessible and affordable, and even in relation to whether services should exist. Important opportunities come from franchising. One thing that is quite helpful is the reference to the requirements for transport authorities to have time to ensure that services are retained for passengers in the event of operators reducing or withdrawing their services before a franchise framework comes into operation. That is an important provision.
For me, part of the issue is about the sheer length of time that the franchising process will take. The requirements are too onerous. The process needs to be simplified—it is too complex and too time consuming. Compared with the process in England, there are a lot more requirements placed on any authority that wants to use the franchising process, and that is not helpful.
I very much agree with Mark that the statutory guidance must be issued as soon as possible. I know that Strathclyde Partnership for Transport is looking at franchising, although I understand that it is not a cheap process; it could cost it £15 million. We need to make progress. However, we also need a reality check, because it could be 2030 before we see bus franchising in Scotland. That means that people will not get the bus services that they need. Although I support franchising, much more needs to change.
I thank the Get Glasgow Moving team for raising that issue with me, to make sure that we focus on making this possible for the benefit of our constituents, because the timescale for this happening is way off into the future.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thanks. I will come back later to ask about some of the changes that have been made.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
Cabinet secretary, could you give a bit of clarity about the fees that will be introduced for electricity consent applications? Will those fees be ring fenced to support the work of the energy consents unit? I draw your attention to the views that we got from Scottish Environment LINK that, if we were to do that, it would be likely to lead to
“better resourcing of the determination process and therefore more timeous processing of applications, without being overly onerous for applicants.â€
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
It is useful to get that on the record. For clarity, you said that you expect the fees to go to the energy consents unit, but can you confirm that that is definitely what will happen?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
That would be useful. I know from being in various local authorities recently the differences between places where people can drop materials for collection 5 feet away and places where they have a long walk to recycle things. In the latter case, it is just not happening.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
I have a couple of questions about the practical changes that the SSI will make. First, the cabinet secretary referred to the polluter-pays principle. What is the estimated income that will be generated for our local authorities in implementing this piece of work? Also, what are the estimated costs to SEPA of implementing these enforcement powers, and can it generate any income from this?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
I want to put on the record what that means in practice. Is it moving from plastics to cardboard or reducing packaging entirely?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
I welcome those answers, because the issue of small producers and retailers is huge and one that I certainly raised in the first instance.
You did not clarify whether there had been any discussions with local government or NGOs in the drafting of the current regulations.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
I think that issue about there not being a gap is important for environmental standards—we do not want to see a reduction in standards here.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Sarah Boyack
One thing that strikes me here is that significant changes will be taking place, which includes new duties for local authorities and SEPA, but there is gap in relation to advertising the changes. How will our constituents know about them? We need there to be publicity, led by the Scottish Government, so that people will understand what is happening, because it will impact their everyday lives. The changes that the cabinet secretary has mentioned are pretty significant.
I would also like there to be monitoring and analysis of the registration fees that SEPA will receive. Although no concerns have been raised about that, that will enable us to see what practical change is taking place once delivery is under way.
Providing a lot more information on and giving a lot more publicity to the issue would be very much welcome.