The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 524 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
They could be working on a similar proposal. The tenant might think, “Here’s an opportunity for me. I’m going to do this—I’m going to develop it and I am going to make a profit.” The landowner might see that and think, “Actually, I could do that on an even bigger scale if I resume that piece of land and do it with some of my own land”, and therefore stop the tenant from realising the benefit.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
That would be useful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
That situation is likely to be where conflicts would arise.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
A croft is an agricultural landholding—although it comes under different legislation, obviously.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have had some discussion about a transfer test versus a public interest test, which has all been geared towards communities buying land. However, I wonder whether anyone who is buying large tracts of land should face a public interest test. There is nothing in the bill that insists that a new owner follows the land management plan. Given the power and control that owners of large land holdings can have, should whether they will manage the land in the public interest be considered before they buy land?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
I argue that crofters have agricultural landholdings.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
So private buyers are held to a different code, if you like, from community buyers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
On an issue that the committee has discussed with you previously, there are concerns that there could be unintended consequences whereby resumption of a small part of a farm could cost a landowner more than resumption of the whole farm. Will you look at that and how that could be rectified? I am not saying that there should not be compensation for small areas, but if it becomes easier to take the whole farm back from tenancy, that would make matters much worse.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. I look forward to getting something in writing.
I turn to crofting and smallholdings. Rather than reform the legislation on smallholdings, what consideration was given to transferring them to crofting tenancies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
I had wondered whether they had considered their interests being transferred into crofting tenancies.