˿

Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 10 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 622 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

In your written evidence on part 2 of the bill, you say that you responded to the Scottish Government’s consultation on the proposal for new enabling powers, you stated that they

“should be defined objectively, framed as narrowly as possible and any powers to make (or amend) secondary legislation restricted by effective legal boundaries.”

Has the bill, as drafted, delivered that? If not, what are the environmental implications of how the power is currently framed?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Thank you.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

That approach seems easier for Orkney and Shetland, as their sea spaces are unique to them, whereas I think that conflicts will arise in, say, the Minch, where there are several local authorities involved. How will they work together? Do they have the resources to be able to plan?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Are there other instances where such a power would be required? Given that enforcement is an issue for you, could the bill be amended in such a way as to enable the 2017 regulations to be changed while narrowing the scope of the regulatory power that is being implemented through the bill?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

The evidence that we had prior to this is that there is flexibility within the regulations as they stand.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I have a quick supplementary, to give an example of the breadth of what is allowed. Under section 3, regulations can be made

“to ensure consistency or compatibility with other legal regimes (either domestic or international)”.

That is vast. Section 3(a) has some of the standards that should be followed, such as

“restoring, enhancing or managing the natural environment ... preserving, protecting or restoring biodiversity”

and

“environmental assessments”.

Is it possible to amend the bill to say that the powers in it can be used only in pursuit of section 3(a)? That would mean that they could not be as wide as to take in anything—they would have to be within the spirit of the bill and what we are trying to achieve here.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

What are your views on the changes to the statutory purposes for national parks? What will be the practical impact of those changes? What is wrong with the powers as they stand? Is there any likelihood that the changes could lead to a hierarchy of powers and aims?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Does anyone else have any comments?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

So, would you prefer an affirmative order plus a non-regression clause plus a referral back to section 3(a)?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Alongside that, there are obviously benefits to being in areas where there is greater dispersal. I was in the Faroe Islands recently, where they were quite clear that that could help with issues such as microjellyfish and sea lice. However, they were also clear that it could lead to more escapes, because the waters are more energetic. Is having more escapes a reasonable trade-off, because the farms are further out to sea so, especially with salmon farming, the fish are less likely to interact with wild fish?