The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 621 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I can understand to an extent why the cabinet secretary does not want a description of “public interest” to be in the bill. However, there should surely be a reference to it in the bill so that the whole bill uses that framework, which is legally understood. Would she consider lodging an amendment, in discussion with other members who have lodged amendments, that would cover the whole bill, so that all the actions under the bill would be taken in the public interest?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Alongside that, there are obviously benefits to being in areas where there is greater dispersal. I was in the Faroe Islands recently, where they were quite clear that that could help with issues such as microjellyfish and sea lice. However, they were also clear that it could lead to more escapes, because the waters are more energetic. Is having more escapes a reasonable trade-off, because the farms are further out to sea so, especially with salmon farming, the fish are less likely to interact with wild fish?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Would the standards highlighted in section 3(a) be enough to curtail the power and ensure that it was used for the right reasons?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
I asked whether the proposed changes could create a hierarchy of aims for a national park. The legislation as it stands says that all aims are equal unless there is a conflict between them. I guess the concern is that, if you upset that balance, you might end up with a hierarchy of aims, and that could impact on people’s views of a national park.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
When the bill was initially proposed, there were concerns about local economies, local cultures and the like being secondary to a national park’s main aim, which is to preserve the nature and biodiversity of the park. I see more reluctance or pushback against new national parks than there was when the first legislation went through, when people were keen to have national parks in their area. The issue seems to have become a lot more controversial. Have the aims changed slightly, and has that led to a lack of confidence among those living and working in national parks?
12:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
That approach seems easier for Orkney and Shetland, as their sea spaces are unique to them, whereas I think that conflicts will arise in, say, the Minch, where there are several local authorities involved. How will they work together? Do they have the resources to be able to plan?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Are there other instances where such a power would be required? Given that enforcement is an issue for you, could the bill be amended in such a way as to enable the 2017 regulations to be changed while narrowing the scope of the regulatory power that is being implemented through the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
The evidence that we had prior to this is that there is flexibility within the regulations as they stand.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
So, would you prefer an affirmative order plus a non-regression clause plus a referral back to section 3(a)?