The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1190 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I am not meaning that. It is about the jury numbers. It has been suggested that, if we go for a majority of 10 out of 15, we would be an outlier. However, we were already an outlier under the original proposals in the bill. My question is whether we should accept that we are going to be an outlier or whether we try to bring ourselves into line—I do not like using the term “into line”, but you know what I mean. Should we mimic another jurisdiction, so that we are not an outlier? That is what I am trying to get at. Does that make sense?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
But you do not think that it—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Is it also fair to say that there has already been quite a bit of change, even as we have been discussing the bill? We have heard about the change to corroboration, for example.
12:30In my experience of the justice system, change often happens through decisions that are made in court. For example, the supreme court is currently looking at section 275 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. Whether change should happen in the courts or in Parliament is perhaps a moot point, but it does happen in the courts.
Is it fair to say that there has already been quite a bit of change? I would include in that the fact that the Lord Advocate herself, and some of the victims in their testimonies in evidence to us, have said that they see a bit of a change in the Crown’s approach to involving victims a bit more in their cases.
I suppose that my question is a yes-or-no one. Do you agree that you can get quite a bit of change without legislating for it? That is really what you have been saying, I suppose.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
My question is, how do you resolve the situation if you are worried that Scotland would be an outlier? Do we just be the outlier and adjust our system, bearing in mind that removing the not proven verdict would apply not just to sexual offences cases, but to all cases that go before the court? Surely England must have some equivalent to corroboration.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you—that is helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Is that for sexual offences cases?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
For all offences?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Right.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I hope that this does not need to be said, but I think that we all agree that the treatment of victims in our court system is completely unsatisfactory and we need change—that is my view, anyway. The question is what kind of change is going to make a difference. We have specialist courts—we have the drugs courts and domestic abuse courts, which were introduced without legislation. Do you agree that we could, in theory, set up a specialist court of the High Court and the sheriff court without legislation? We have done that previously.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
My next question—