The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1190 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pauline McNeill
Chief Superintendent Paden, do you want to add anything?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pauline McNeill
Dr Steel, it seems that a significant resource would be required to create such a model, notwithstanding what you said about health boards in different parts of Scotland. Do you also agree that one of the reasons that the police pick up those cases is because they are the service of last resort and they work 24 hours, seven days a week, which a lot of services do not. Do you agree that we have to sort that situation in order to create the model?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 January 2025
Pauline McNeill
You have answered it: the service would need to be 24/7 in order to capture those people. Otherwise, we will be back where we started—with the police.
My next question is for ACC Paton and Chief Superintendent Paden. The Scottish Police Federation’s evidence to the committee states:
“It is our view that this area of business is the single biggest inhibitor in operational officers across Scotland being able to carry out their core function”,
which is what I think that you were saying to the committee earlier. However, it also says:
“We have evidence that community triage teams are now pushing back on calls from Police Scotland due to a lack of capacity within their area of business.”
I suppose that that goes back to Ben Macpherson’s question. Police Scotland has to deal with the here and now, and the model that we are talking about seems quite a long way off. Do you want to comment on that, ACC Paton?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
That is because such information would not normally be available, because the convictions are spent—I understand. I am trying to understand the purpose of the order so that I understand what it does. The SSI will make that information available slightly earlier and give more information in relation to the application for the relevant orders.
In your view, is it more likely that such orders would be granted if we legislate for the change? What is the purpose of the SSI? Why is the information needed earlier? Does having that information give the police, who obviously think that it is required, a better chance to get the application granted?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you. That makes sense. There is a gap. I just wanted to be clear before we come to a conclusion. We always have to be careful about spent convictions—if they are included, it must be for a reason. I just wanted to be sure that what we are doing is proportionate, and I am satisfied about that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Right. I see.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
You said “unspent convictions”. Does the order also include spent convictions for lower-tariff applications?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
So, the SSI will make the process smoother. I ask for completeness: will the change to the process include information that was not previously given in relation to lower-tariff offences?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
That is the confusing bit. You are saying that the issue is one of process—I understand that—but you specifically said that the new process will include lower-tariff offences, whereas it used to apply to higher-tariff offences only. That looks like a substantial change.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. I am trying to get my head around this. Do you mean that, prior to this SSI, extra information for lower-tariff applications has not been available?