The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 132 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Davy Russell
I would keep it open. One of the reasons why is that the Government has not explained how it will finance all of this, from infrastructure to ambulance resources鈥攊t has no idea. I submitted a freedom of information request. I think that there are too many unanswered questions for us to close it at this time.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Davy Russell
I would also point out that, when the chief constable was here about six or seven weeks ago, she said that she was working to improve all data recording, regardless of the crime.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Davy Russell
Yes, but I do not think that it is good for kids not to be in school or in class. We may need a system where they are moved to another class or another school, so there should be a system set up to allow that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Davy Russell
Yes.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2026
Davy Russell
Yes, I think that that is the way to go. In summing up, the commissioner鈥檚 submission notes that automatic exclusion is a bit severe, and every individual case should be treated on its own merits. That should be the presumption.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:As Fergus Ewing said, this is a much bigger issue. The amending of digital material is widespread. The BBC and other organisations that are supposed to be above reproach have altered digital material鈥攖he Donald Trump thing comes to mind. It is perhaps too big an issue for this committee can deal with. It requires a full review.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
In light of the moves that the Scottish Government has made, I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that certain categories of asylum seekers are already eligible to access the statutory national concessionary travel scheme and the Scottish Government has suggested that any long-term actions to extend the scheme to all asylum seekers will depend on the evaluation of the pilot that is currently under way.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity to highlight our concerns regarding the lack of clarity on whether concessionary travel will be available to all asylum seekers beyond March 2026. The committee could also highlight the option for the petitioners to submit an updated petition in the next parliamentary session, should they consider that the Scottish Government鈥檚 actions on the matter are not sufficient.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:It is quite a complex matter. As well as Scottish Water and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, other agencies, such as planning authorities, are involved. I was quite involved with the issue when I worked in Glasgow, because it overlaps with other issues. Brock burn and the River Cart originate in the hills of East Renfrewshire, which is where the convener鈥檚 constituency is.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:That is because of the 拢10 million that I spent on upgrading the lower downstream.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:Reasonable flood risk management plans are in place there, but they are a bit out of date because there has been much more rain in recent years. That is the real crux of the matter. The plans were probably just about fit for purpose, but the weather has slightly changed now. Previously, there would be a flood once in 100 years; now, there is about one in 30 years鈥攑erhaps it is even more frequent than that in some areas. It is quite a big exercise, but the approach needs to be focused rather than broad.