The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 198 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
I know.
Trust in the BBC is important to parliamentarians, but it is important to us as viewers, too. Let me take you to the “River City” workplace meeting of 18 March, where the clear impression was given to staff that one reason for ending the show was that the site lease would end in 2026, with no option to renew. I have a recording of that meeting and I have a transcript that I am happy to share with the committee. At 3 minutes and 57 seconds, Gavin Smith said:
“The site lease comes to an end next year without the option to renew. This is a clear obstacle and it’s inevitably prompted a decision to be made.”
11:15At 4 minutes and 25 seconds, when he was speaking about the prospect of relocating, Gavin Smith said:
“It would ... mean significant additional investment for rebuilds.”
Counting in the rebuilding of the set was part of the decision to halt “River City”, as it would have inflated the cost. There was no need to rebuild if you could have continued on site.
When she was asked specifically by a member of staff whether it was the landlord’s decision or BBC Scotland’s decision, Louise Thornton said, at 7 minutes and 35 seconds:
“So it’s our understanding that there isn’t an option to renew the lease, that it’s come to an end ... And so when we were looking at all the options, that wasn’t on the table”.
Why did the BBC tell the cast and the crew that the lease could not be renewed? That was clearly not the case—I have spoken to the landlord. Why did the BBC seek to deliberately mislead the cast and the crew of “River City”?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
Can I deal with that point, which is important? RAAC has been known about on site for more than a year, and nothing has been done—you have carried on with production. It is in an insignificant part of the site, and the position is stable.
This is a red herring. I invite you to address the issue rather than hiding behind RAAC.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
They think that you misled them. They cannot all have got it wrong. Thank you, convener.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
I should say for the record that, if you had more politicians on your podcasts, I am not sure what that would do for viewing figures.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
Yes, but where did that come from?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
That is a different argument, and I would respect that argument if it had been advanced at the meeting on 18 March. Instead, cast and crew members were misled about the basis for the reasoning. In the transcript, the option to remain was not on the table at all—it was not considered.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
No, and indeed that is an argument that you could advance, but I am specifically addressing the fact that you misled cast and crew members. The option to renew the lease was clearly available to you; you chose not to renew, and there were diversionary tactics to blame the landlord. Just fess up to it—just be honest with people.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
Convener, I have one last request of you. Would the committee consider a visit to “River City”, so that you can see the scale of the operation and the ecosystem that supports it? Who knows? Patrick Harvie might get a walk-on part as many Dumbarton residents have done in their time. I would commend that to the committee.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
Clearly, convener, it was the case—this is from the landlord’s own mouth—that there was no intention to end the lease, so it is very disappointing that that impression was given.
I will move on to the slightly wider issue of the production facilities at Dumbarton. It is not just “River City” that will end; all production will cease at Dumbarton as the lease is given up. The BBC seems to think that it can manage without permanent production facilities in Scotland, and it will not be permanently replacing the capacity that was afforded by the studios at Dumbarton. What do you think are the implications of that decision?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
I have a confession. I am not just the MSP for Dumbarton; I feel as if I am the de facto MSP for Shieldinch as well.
I had the benefit of speaking directly to the landlord because I knew who they were. To suggest that they were surprised that BBC Scotland indicated that it wanted to leave would perhaps be an understatement. They were expecting the lease to be renewed and had no plans to do anything other than to continue the lease. For whatever reason, it appears that the BBC was happy to have people believe that the decision was down to the actions of the landlord and not one that it made itself, which, frankly, is simply not true. Why do you think that it did that? Paul, do you want to go first?