The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 198 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jackie Baillie
Okay. That is good to hear.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jackie Baillie
Hold on one second, Mr Stewart. I will direct my next question to you鈥攜ou can wrap both answers up together. Has the full children鈥檚 rights and wellbeing impact assessment of the mental health transition and recovery plan been published?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Jackie Baillie
Thank you. I have no relevant interests to declare.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 20 January 2022
Jackie Baillie
Good morning. You will be aware that the Scottish Government stopped fertility treatment for those women who were not fully vaccinated on the day before Christmas eve, with no notice being given. I understand that, on 7 January, the Scottish Government then extended the suspension to include treatment in the private sector.
As I am sure you can imagine, the women who were preparing for treatment in early January were distraught, to be frank, and they went through considerable emotional turmoil. In some cases, women were vaccinated but, because they had caught Covid, they could not get their booster in time and their treatment was cancelled, too. There was a real feeling that the lack of an individual approach, with the blanket ban, was not fair on many of the women who were involved.
Other women have since been in touch because they are genuinely confused. The advice from health professionals at the very start of the Covid pandemic was that pregnant women and those who were expecting to be pregnant within the next three months should not be vaccinated. You and I both know that that advice has since changed, but it strikes me that there is genuine confusion.
I have three questions. First, can you get clinicians to explain to those women who are undergoing fertility treatment how the guidance has changed, and to reassure them? Currently, there is confusion. Secondly, as cases are starting to decline, when will the service be resumed, and will it be conditional? Thirdly, will women who have been caught up in and affected by this issue get an extra cycle of in vitro fertilisation to make up for what has been lost?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Jackie Baillie
An important lesson in politics, as in life, is to quit while you are ahead, and I thank the cabinet secretary for his support.
Amendment 4, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendment 3 moved鈥擺Jackie Baillie]鈥攁nd agreed to.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Jackie Baillie
I am grateful to the committee for the opportunity to move amendment 4 and to speak to amendments 4 and 3 in my name. The amendments flow from the evidence that the committee took prior to stage 1 of the bill.
The policy intention behind amendment 4 is straightforward. It extends the eligibility period for women who have arranged surgery for mesh removal. Members will recall that the original cut-off date that was suggested by the Government was 12 July 2021, and the committee was clear that, to capture as many women as possible, we needed to be as generous and flexible with eligibility criteria as possible, and we did not want any unnecessary barriers to be placed in the way of women accessing reimbursement. At the time, the cabinet secretary said that he would give the matter further consideration, so here I am with my two amendments.
Amendments 4 and 3 have the same effect, but achieve the desired outcome in two different ways. It is very much for the committee to decide which it would prefer.
Amendment 4 places a provision in the bill to say that, in order to qualify, any removal surgery must have been arranged before royal assent. Amendment 3 stipulates that the date will be specified in the scheme but that it can be no earlier than the date of royal assent. Ultimately, the difference is whether members want to put the qualifying date in the bill or in the scheme.
I move amendment 4.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Jackie Baillie
I have a couple of quick questions.
One witness鈥擨 cannot remember who鈥攊dentified poverty and inequality as being among the main barriers to access. I suspect that you would all do that, so I will put my question to Kim Atkinson. Access to facilities for disadvantaged communities has been, and continues to be, a perennial problem. My example is of a local football team in a disadvantaged area. It costs them 拢100 for one session on a local football pitch that is owned by the local authority. How do we get beyond that, so that we remove barriers to access?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Jackie Baillie
Given that we all agree, is your action plan, with revenue attached, the route in?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Jackie Baillie
I have never known a politician refuse to speak, convener.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Jackie Baillie
I wonder whether it would be possible, in addition to writing the Scottish Government, to consider writing to Play Scotland, organisations that represent mother and toddler groups and educational psychologists to see whether there is any impact on socialisation.