The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 348 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Your submission sets out that it will be important that
“targets are set ... at the appropriate spatial scale and timescale.”
Can you explain that? Does the framework of the bill ensure that, or is there a need for additional target-setting criteria, as has been suggested by some stakeholders?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Some of this has already been covered, but I am interested in the relationship between the Scottish biodiversity strategy and the statutory targets, which Caroline McParland mentioned earlier. Some written evidence suggests that we have to ensure that the statutory targets in part 1 of the bill align with the 2030 and 2045 deadlines. I am conscious that the strategy document hints at that. It states:
“These targets, like our climate targets, will secure accountability, driving action across Government. They will be focused on achieving the overarching goal of this Strategy”.
Do the witnesses have thoughts about how the targets would work with the 2030 and 2045 deadlines?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
What do you think is the value of the statutory targets beyond what we already have in the six-year implementation plans for the Scottish biodiversity strategy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Can I just double check something? I get what Stephen Young was saying about the status element, but I have some concerns about the necessity of that. The 2030 and 2045 targets are not in the bill; it just talks about the biodiversity strategy. On status, do you think that it should explicitly say in the bill that the new statutory targets are to align with the 2030 and 2045 targets?
I see that no one wants to come in on that. That is what was suggested in the written evidence from NFUS, I think.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
I think that it was in SLE’s evidence, too. Stephen, did you not put that in your written evidence? I will check and text you later to tell you whether I am right.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
There is a new power that allows national park authorities to impose fixed-penalty notices. Does anybody have any comments on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has recommended that the affirmative procedure should apply to the power allowing Scottish ministers to add to the category of “assistance dog”. Currently, the negative procedure would apply. Can you explain your thinking as to why the negative procedure would be proportionate and appropriate in this case?
11:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Maurice, in your letter to the committee, you say that a statutory offence would be used more than the common law offence of theft is used at the moment. You give breach of the peace as an example of that. What benefits do you see in having a statutory offence rather than a common-law offence?