The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of 成人快手 and committees will automatically update to show only the 成人快手 and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of 成人快手 and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of 成人快手 and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 348 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Convener, I missed a question earlier, so, if it is all right, I will just jump back to it.
Again, this was discussed last week, but the Faculty of Advocates has suggested that, in part 2, there could be an extra power to seek directions from the court where there might be issues during a factory. Could such a power be warranted in the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
To be honest, I think that Josie Allan has answered my next question with that relevant point. There are situations in which a missing person returns but needs support and, equally, a person might return and be perfectly able to take on their finances again. I do not know how it would be written, but could some of that be set out in the bill and the rest put in guidance? Could we have something that sets out a procedure that allows people who are perfectly able to take on their finances as quickly as possible to do so and a procedure for situations in which there might be a concern about the person in question? Does that make sense?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
I think that you answered my next question, in part, when you replied to the last couple of questions. Part 2 of the bill mentions the roles, responsibilities, powers and duties of the judicial factor, which you have made comments on. One comment was about a present for an 18th birthday. For the record, will you say whether the bill sets out the powers and duties that a family member would need to manage the estate of a missing person? You spoke a wee bit about having guidance or provisions in the bill. Do you have a preference about that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
It would just be interesting to see the costs that are attached to that. To clarify the point, if we did not want to create that because of the cost involved, is there an issue with using the register of inhibitions as a public-facing register for the factors that are in place?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
In the past couple of weeks, we have discussed having a complaints process in the bill. There was a suggestion that if somebody was unhappy, the first port of call would be a referral to the Accountant of Court, and then to the court itself. Do you think that there is a need to have that explicitly laid out in the bill? I assume that that is how it already works in practice, but should it be spelled out, and do you see any issues with that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Last week, we had a bit of a discussion about the register of inhibitions and whether that, as the bill suggests, is the correct place to put what is, in effect, the list of judicial factors. Do you think that it is the correct place? Last week, the Faculty of Advocates said that it was probably not the right place and that perhaps a new list could be created. If that were to be done, would that give you any resourcing issues?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay, that makes sense. You are saying that, outwith the bill, those complaints procedures are already in place, and that you have to abide by those rules. Therefore, in your view, it does not need to be explicit in the bill because you have to abide by the rules anyway.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay, perfect. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
That is fine. Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Tim Eagle
That is great鈥攖hank you.