The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will automatically update to show only the łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of łÉČËżěĘÖ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 399 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
My question was on that point. I was looking at the evidence, and it is a very difficult issue, is it not? I get Rhoda Grant’s point that farming varies quite significantly across Scotland. If we are talking about the north-east corner of Scotland, we can argue that there are traditional spring and autumn calving herds. Therefore, the spring calving herd is potentially more likely to meet the 410-day threshold, whereas the autumn calving herd might not—or a lower proportion of them would meet that.
Is there a risk that management changes in the long term might involve a shift more towards spring calving? What effect might that have in relation to stock coming to market? I am not suggesting that that will happen, but I am curious about whether that has been factored into any of your discussions. It sounds as though it has.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Good morning. I have a few questions. The first is a point of clarification. If a cow slips and goes over the calving interval and then has a calf, there will not be a payment for that calf but, if the cow has a calf in future within the 410 days, there will be a payment. Is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
That was on heifer calves. That is fine, because they get the payment. In the second year, if a calf is born within 410 days, it attracts the payment. If that cow then slipped—if it did not have a calf that year but had one the following year—that would then not get the payment, because it would be outwith the 410 days. It would be 600 days or whatever. However, if it had a calf the following year within the 410 days, that would get the payment again. Is that correct?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
What are your thoughts on what will happen post that date? You are introducing the scheme now, but we are only three or four years off that date. What would that support look like in future? Will the scheme carry on? What will any scheme for voluntary coupled support look like?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay—thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Yes—sorry, minister. That had just gone out of my head. My computer crashed, which is sending me funny.
I apologise to the convener and the minister—I forgot to declare my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am a farmer, although I do not have cattle. I should have said that earlier, so apologies for that.
I have a quick question on peatland, minister. Timber extraction—unless I have missed it—is not explicitly mentioned in the regulations, but there might be instances in which roads would need to be built. Wind turbines are mentioned, but not timber. Has that come across your thoughts?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
I think that I know where you are coming from on that. You are trying to make it as efficient as possible to meet the target. The question is how it works in practice in the industry.
Is there a risk of misrecording? Could farmers start registering calves that then die so that they can get within the 410 days? Is that likely?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay, that is fine—it is possible to do that.
With autumn calving, slips are much more likely in percentage terms. At that time, it is much less likely that the calving interval that you propose will be met. That is a worry, is it not, because we want distribution of stock coming to market across the year. Have you taken any evidence, or do you have any concerns about, the risks of calving at certain points in the year? An SRUC study suggested that 63 to 65 per cent of late autumn calves would meet the 410-day threshold, which means that around 40 per cent of late autumn calvers might not meet that condition.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
I asked you that question because we do not yet have the rural support plan. We have the agenda that the Government would like to go on, but we do not yet have the detail. We, and our farmers in particular, are questioning what is coming. They are wondering, “What avenue do I take? How do I take that? If I go down this route now as I plan for my business, what will the scheme come out with?” That is what I am worried about. Coupled support is important in parts of Scotland and, to be fair, probably all of Scotland. I am curious to see what your thoughts are on it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Tim Eagle
Thank you, convener—was I coming in at this point?