The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of ˿ and committees will automatically update to show only the ˿ and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of ˿ and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of ˿ and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 401 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Tim Eagle
They are in the first four.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Tim Eagle
This morning, we have been driving at that bigger picture. You cannot do things in isolation; it is about having a collaborative approach over whole landscapes.
I will move on to my next question. Through the bill, the Scottish Government is taking a delegated power and saying, “We can have full control over this through secondary legislation.” Framework legislation is a nightmare because, on the one hand, it is adaptable, you can easily move things behind the scenes and you can respond quickly, but it also brings problems economically, because businesses have no certainty over how things might change over time. Do you have any thoughts on whether that power in the bill is necessary?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning, and thank you for your answers so far. We have slightly touched on this point already, but I was looking at the English report that came out about sites of special scientific interest and SPAs and I noted that more and more of them are in an unfavourable condition. These are important pieces of legislation that are designed specifically to target species, whatever the impact on the wider landscape, but is there is a problem there? In relation to this bill, what are we looking at?
My second question will be about the devolved power, but, first, what is causing that problem and what can we do in this bill? I presume that the situation in Scotland is similar.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Tim Eagle
This is important. There are deep concerns, and you have legal concerns. Have you thought about what we could do in the bill? How do we protect what we have but retain the ability to enhance that? Do we need a code of practice, or should we have a more expansive provision in the bill to deal with the issue?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
What is NatureScot’s relationship with the code? I ask that because my understanding is that, under the 1996 act, you had to “have regard to” the code of practice. I am not quite clear now. In some parts, I think that “have regard to” has gone, but it remains in section 5 of the 1996 act. That is not particularly strong, is it? You have to have regard to, but it does not matter. In your minds, will NatureScot work to the code that is produced?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I looked up a definition, which I have here. It says:
“Case law from 2014 notes that to have regard to a matter means simply that that matter must be specifically considered not that it must be given greater weight than other matters.”
Some stakeholders are coming to me and saying, “I don’t know what NatureScot is going to do with the code of practice.” I think that they need the explicit knowledge that everything that you write in it will be built with them and that it will also be what you follow.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
My second question is about legal resource within NatureScot. I had a figure that the recent intervention at the Loch Choire Estate cost you nearly £14,000. For clarity, if you are dealing with the numbers that we spoke about earlier, are you confident that you have the legal resource within NatureScot to deliver it all?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
I agree with that. It is about making sure that there are no initial barriers. I am pleased that you are thinking about options. We have an incredible amount of talent out there and some experienced people.
Quite a lot of international guests come to Scotland. I do not know whether you can put it on record yet or whether you have thought about it, but I presume that we might be able to do something along the lines of allowing them to come and there being no need for them to do any further stuff, assuming they are accompanied by someone who is fit and competent by our law.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. That is fine.
Elena Whitham asked a good question. We talk a lot about the upland context, but we do not talk enough about the lowland context, which is much more problematic. If we want to achieve the reduction of deer numbers, for the purposes of nature restoration or whatever it is, we do not want to have barriers. Have you thought about having a referee scheme or a grandfather rights-type scheme for the fit and competent element that, at least in the interim, could help those in the sector to officiate one another until we can get an official standard? Do you know what that official thing will be?